The Uncoordinated Teachers Puzzle
Autor: | Michael Cohen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Tilburg Center for Logic, Ethics and Philosophy of Science |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Episteme, 1-8 STARTPAGE=1;ENDPAGE=8;ISSN=0165-0904;TITLE=Episteme |
ISSN: | 0165-0904 |
DOI: | 10.1017/epi.2023.6 |
Popis: | Williamson (2000) argues that the KK principle is inconsistent with knowledge of margin for error in cases of inexact perceptual observations. This paper argues, primarily by analogy to a different scenario, that Williamson's argument is fallacious. Margin for error principles describe the agent's knowledge as a result of an inexact perceptual event, not the agent's knowledge state in general. Therefore, epistemic agents can use their knowledge of margin for error at most once after a perceptual event, but not more. This insight blocks a crucial step in Williamson's original argument. Along the way, the value of standard epistemic logic for analyzing margin for error reasoning is challenged. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |