The Uncoordinated Teachers Puzzle

Autor: Michael Cohen
Přispěvatelé: Tilburg Center for Logic, Ethics and Philosophy of Science
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Episteme, 1-8
STARTPAGE=1;ENDPAGE=8;ISSN=0165-0904;TITLE=Episteme
ISSN: 0165-0904
DOI: 10.1017/epi.2023.6
Popis: Williamson (2000) argues that the KK principle is inconsistent with knowledge of margin for error in cases of inexact perceptual observations. This paper argues, primarily by analogy to a different scenario, that Williamson's argument is fallacious. Margin for error principles describe the agent's knowledge as a result of an inexact perceptual event, not the agent's knowledge state in general. Therefore, epistemic agents can use their knowledge of margin for error at most once after a perceptual event, but not more. This insight blocks a crucial step in Williamson's original argument. Along the way, the value of standard epistemic logic for analyzing margin for error reasoning is challenged.
Databáze: OpenAIRE