Biomechanical evaluation between orthodontic attachment and three different materials after various surface treatments: A three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis
Autor: | Çağla Şar, Zafer C. Cehreli, Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı, İrem Kurt |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Surface (mathematics)
Materials science Orthodontic Brackets Surface Properties Optical profilometry Monolithic zirconia Dental Bonding Orthodontics Original Articles 030206 dentistry Silanes Silicon Dioxide Dental Porcelain Resin Cements 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Materials Testing Surface roughness Composite material Shear Strength |
Zdroj: | Angle Orthod |
ISSN: | 1945-7103 0003-3219 |
DOI: | 10.2319/072918-547.1 |
Popis: | Objectives: To determine the best bonding method of orthodontic attachment among monolithic zirconia, feldspathic porcelain, hybrid porcelain, and the impact of surface-conditioning methods using a three-dimensional optical profilometer after debonding. Materials and Methods: 56 feldspathic porcelain, 56 monolithic zirconia, and 56 hybrid porcelain samples were divided into four surface treatment subgroups: (1) hydrofluoric (HF) acid etch + silane, (2) Al2O3 sandblasting + silane, (3) silicoating (SiO2), and (4) diamond bur + silane. The specimens were tested to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS). Residual composite was removed after debonding. Three-dimensional white-light interferometry was used to obtain quantitative measurements on surface roughness. Results: The highest SBS value was found for the HF acid–etched feldspathic porcelain group. The average surface roughness values were significantly higher in all material groups in which diamond bur was applied, while roughening with Cojet provided average surface roughness values closer to the original material surface. Conclusions: Variations in structures of the materials and roughening techniques affected the SBS and surface roughness findings. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |