Hypervigilance for Bodily Sensations in the Back During a Movement Task in People With Chronic and Recurrent Low Back Pain
| Autor: | Jessica Van Oosterwijck, Amanda Clauwaert, Lieven Danneels, Stefaan Van Damme, Stijn Schouppe |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE
CATASTROPHIZING SCALE TAMPA SCALE FEAR-AVOIDANCE MODEL 0302 clinical medicine 030202 anesthesiology Fibromyalgia Medicine and Health Sciences EEG FIBROMYALGIA health care economics and organizations Catastrophization somatosensory attention Fear Fear-avoidance model Low back pain Chronic low back pain SEP population characteristics medicine.symptom SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX medicine.medical_specialty Depression scale Movement Clinical Neurology HOSPITAL ANXIETY Tactile stimuli 03 medical and health sciences Physical medicine and rehabilitation health services administration medicine Humans TACTILE STIMULI CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS business.industry social sciences Hypervigilance equipment and supplies medicine.disease recurrent low back pain DEPRESSION SCALE Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Touch chronic low back pain Neurology (clinical) business Recurrent Low Back Pain Low Back Pain human activities 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN |
| ISSN: | 0749-8047 1536-5409 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000823 |
| Popis: | Objectives. The current study assessed the role of hypervigilance for bodily sensations in the back in long term low back pain (LBP) problems. Methods. People with chronic low back pain (CLBP), recurrent low back pain (RLBP), and no LBP were compared on the extent to which they attended to somatosensory stimuli on the back during a movement task. To measure hypervigilance, somatosensory event-related potentials (SEP) to task-irrelevant tactile stimuli on the back were measured when preparing movements in either a threatening or a neutral condition, indicated by a cue signaling possible pain on the back during movement or not. Results. Results showed stronger attending to stimuli on the back in the threat condition than in the neutral condition, as reflected by increased amplitude of the N96 SEP. However, this effect did not differ between groups. The CLBP group showed a larger P171 SEP than the other groups, but this effect was not dependent upon condition, suggesting a more general state of arousal resulting in increased somatosensory responsiveness. No significant associations were found between somatosensory attending to the back and theorized antecedents such as pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear and pain vigilance. Discussion. The current study confirmed that individuals preparing a movement attended more towards somatosensory stimuli at the lower back when anticipating back pain during the movement, as measured by the N96 SEP. However, no differences were found for this component between participants suffering from CLBP or RLBP, or the healthy controls. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|