Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing
| Autor: | Giuseppe Cioffo, Maïté Kervyn de Lettenhove, Carlos Ramirez Chaves, Cécile Giraud |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Research ethics
ComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSION Research methodology media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 050401 social sciences methods 050301 education Review Committees Space (commercial competition) Education Variety (cybernetics) lcsh:Ethics Philosophy 0504 sociology Institution Engineering ethics Sociology Social science research lcsh:BJ1-1725 0503 education Qualitative research media_common |
| Zdroj: | Research Ethics Review, Vol 15 (2019) |
| ISSN: | 2047-6094 1747-0161 |
| Popis: | Ethics review committees have become a common institution in English-speaking research communities, and are now increasingly being adopted in a variety of research environments. In light of existing debates on the aptness of ethics review boards for assessing research work in the social sciences, this article investigates the ways in which researchers navigate issues of research ethics in the absence of a formal review procedure or of an ethics review board. Through the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, the article questions the overall utility of ethics review boards. Highlighting the importance of space for sharing, the authors argue for the development of a new type of structure that takes into account researchers’ ‘ethos of responsibility’ as an adequate ethical compass for research in the social sciences. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|