Can the Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator System replace anterior iliac crest grafting when treating long bone nonunion?
Autor: | Richard Volpi, Marie Le Baron, Pascal Maman, Xavier Flecher, Jean-Philippe Vivona |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
Time Factors medicine.medical_treatment Long bone Bone grafting Iliac crest Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Femur Prospective Studies Fracture Healing 030222 orthopedics Bone Transplantation Orthopedic Equipment Middle Aged musculoskeletal system surgical procedures operative medicine.anatomical_structure Tissue and Organ Harvesting Female Femoral Fractures Adult musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty Operative Time Nonunion Bone healing Transplantation Autologous Ilium Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences medicine Humans Tibia Therapeutic Irrigation Retrospective Studies Femur fracture business.industry 030229 sport sciences Length of Stay medicine.disease Surgery Tibial Fractures Fractures Ununited Diaphyses business |
Zdroj: | Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 105:529-533 |
ISSN: | 1877-0568 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.12.011 |
Popis: | INTRODUCTION Autologous bone graft is the gold standard for filling bone defects associated with diaphyseal nonunions. It is typically harvested from the anterior iliac crest (AIC) despite the high complication rate. The Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator System (RIA) was developed to recover the reaming aspirate and use it as autograft. Initially described for harvesting bone from the femur, the bone volume available is similar to the AIC site; however, its use directly at nonunion sites has been studied very little. HYPOTHESES Compared to AIC harvesting, RIA at a non-union site will result in (1) sufficient bone volume, (2) similar time to union and union rate, (3) lower morbidity. RESULTS Two groups of patients received an autograft for aseptic nonunion of the tibia or femur for a bone defect up to 2cm: the RIA group (n=30) was followed prospectively and received an autograft by RIA while the AIC group (n=29) was reviewed retrospectively and received an autograft by AIC. We compared the time to union and union rate, operative time, intake of analgesics, duration of hospital stay and complication rate between groups. The RIA provided sufficient bone, 60cm3 on average in a reliable manner. The union rate was similar between groups: 90% (RIA) and 89.7% (CIA) (p=0.965), while the time to union was shorter in the RIA group (8.63±1.47months vs. 10.08±1.7 months) (p=0.006). The operative time (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |