Assessment of exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: Far-field capture masquerading as entrance without exit block
| Autor: | Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Angela Naperkowski, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, Randle Storm, Jess W. Oren, Gopi Dandamudi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Radiofrequency ablation medicine.medical_treatment Pulmonary vein law.invention Electrocardiography Heart Conduction System Superior vena cava law Physiology (medical) Internal medicine Atrial Fibrillation medicine Humans Ejection fraction medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Atrial fibrillation Middle Aged medicine.disease Ablation Catheter Treatment Outcome Echocardiography Pulmonary Veins Catheter Ablation cardiovascular system Cardiology Female Tomography X-Ray Computed Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | Heart Rhythm. 9:1653-1659 |
| ISSN: | 1547-5271 |
| Popis: | Background Complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) remains the cornerstone of ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. Entrance block without exit block has been reported to occur in 40% of the patients. Far-field capture (FFC) can occur during pacing from the superior PVs to assess exit block, and this may appear as persistent conduction from PV to left atrium (LA). Objective To facilitate accurate assessment of exit block. Methods Twenty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation referred for ablation were included in the study. Once PV isolation (entrance block) was confirmed, pacing from all the bipoles on the Lasso catheter was used to assess exit block by using a pacing stimulus of 10 mA at 2 ms. Evidence for PV capture without conduction to LA was necessary to prove exit block. If conduction to LA was noticed, pacing output was decreased until there was PV capture without conduction to LA or no PV capture was noted to assess for far-field capture in both the upper PVs. Results All 20 patients underwent successful isolation (entrance block) of all 76 (4 left common PV) veins: mean age 58 ± 9 years; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 40%; hypertension 70%, diabetes mellitus 30%, coronary artery disease 15%; left ventricular ejection fraction 55% ± 10%; LA size 42 ± 11 mm. Despite entrance block, exit block was absent in only 16% of the PVs, suggesting persistent PV to LA conduction. FFC of LA appendage was noted in 38% of the left superior PVs. FFC of the superior vena cava was noted in 30% of the right superior PVs. The mean pacing threshold for FFC was 7 ± 4 mA. Decreasing pacing output until only PV capture (loss of FFC) is noted was essential to confirm true exit block. Conclusions FFC of LA appendage or superior vena cava can masquerade as persistent PV to LA conduction. A careful assessment for PV capture at decreasing pacing output is essential to exclude FFC. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|