On the hierarchy between extradition and human rights

Autor:	van der Wilt, H., de Wet, E., Vidmar, J.
Přispěvatelé:	IRL Prog 2009-2016 (ACIL, FdR)
Jazyk:	angličtina
Rok vydání:	2012
Předmět:	International human rights law Human rights State (polity) Reservation of rights Torture Law Political science media_common.quotation_subject Fundamental rights International law Right to property media_common
Zdroj:	Hierarchy in international law: the place of human rights, 148-175 STARTPAGE=148;ENDPAGE=175;TITLE=Hierarchy in international law: the place of human rights
Popis:	A requested state will be confronted with conflicting obligations stemming from extradition treaties and treaties on human rights, whenever the applicant faces a real risk that his or her fundamental rights will be violated by the requesting state. These conflicts are not easily solved. With the exception of torture, international law does not acknowledge the general primacy of human rights over extradition. States have applied different avoidance techniques — rule of non-inquiry, reliance on assurances, and local remedies — to evade these conflicts. However, the European Court of Human Rights in particular has accentuated the human rights standards and has admonished states parties to take these rights seriously.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::bcf0a13d89b77c52d2aef4d80eb407cb https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.375876 Zobrazit plný text záznamu