The legal nature of the state and the Kingdom of SHS in the context of the conflicting Yugoslav ideologies
| Autor: | Igor Ivašković |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Yugoslav ideologies
History udc:070 Constitution Kingdom of Serbia media_common.quotation_subject Kingdom of SHS language.human_language constitution Politics State (polity) Kraljevina Srbija Država SHS Political science Law Kraljevina SHS language State of SHS Ideology jugoslovanske ideologije ustava Serbian media_common |
| Zdroj: | Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 63-81, 2020. |
| ISSN: | 2463-7807 0353-0329 |
| DOI: | 10.51663/pnz.60.2.03 |
| Popis: | Glavna teza prispevka je, da razlike v razlagi pravne narave Države Slovencev, Hrvatov in Srbov ter tudi Kraljestva/Kraljevine Srbov, Hrvatov in Slovencev niso bile posledica pravne negotovosti, temveč so bile le odraz še ene izmed mnogih političnih bitk v vojni nasprotujočih si jugoslovanskih ideologij. Avtor uporablja mednarodna in ustavna merila ter analizira dileme glede pravne narave države SHS in pravne (dis)kontinuitete med Kraljevino Srbijo in Kraljestvom/Kraljevino SHS. Na temelju analize argumentira, da: 1) je Država SHS izpolnjevala temeljne kriterije državnosti in jo lahko imamo za državo ter 2) da je bilo Kraljestvo/Kraljevina SHS nova država, saj ni bila ustvarjena v skladu s standardi prejšnje srbske ustave ravno nasprotno, Kraljestvo SHS je prekinilo ustavno kontinuiteto Kraljevine Srbije. The main thesis of the article is that the differences in the interpretations of the legal natures of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes were not the consequence of legal uncertainty, but rather reflected yet another among the many political battles in the conflict between the opposing Yugoslav ideologies. The author uses the international and constitutional criteria to analyse the dilemmas regarding the legal nature of the State of SHS and the legal (dis)continuity between the Kingdom of Serbia and the Kingdom of SHS. He argues that: 1) the State of SHS satisfied the fundamental requirements to be considered as a state and 2) the Kingdom of SHS was a new state, as it was not created according to the standards of the Serbian Constitution. Moreover, it suspended the constitutional continuity of the Kingdom of Serbia. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|