Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds of Electrode Configurations Available to an Atrioventricular Defibrillator
ISSN: | 1540-8167 1045-3873 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00957.x |
Přístupová URL adresa: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::bbe3ae0a3e3191d2ede4cdb5b4cfa9bf https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00957.x |
Rights: | CLOSED |
Přírůstkové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....bbe3ae0a3e3191d2ede4cdb5b4cfa9bf |
Autor: | Michael E. Benser, Gregory P. Walcott, Steven D. Girouard, Milton M. Morris, Raymond E. Ideker, Cheryl R. Killingsworth |
Rok vydání: | 2001 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Vena Cava Superior Continuous infusion Defibrillation medicine.medical_treatment Electric Countershock Differential Threshold Defibrillation threshold Physiology (medical) Internal medicine Atrial Fibrillation medicine Animals Ventricular Function Electrodes Methacholine Chloride Coronary sinus Sheep business.industry Models Cardiovascular Atrial fibrillation Equipment Design Atrial Function Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator medicine.disease Defibrillators Implantable medicine.anatomical_structure Ventricle Electrode Alabama Cardiology Electrophysiologic Techniques Cardiac Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 12:957-964 |
ISSN: | 1540-8167 1045-3873 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00957.x |
Popis: | INTRODUCTION: Little investigation has been conducted to assess the atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations using electrodes designed for internal ventricular defibrillation (right ventricle [RV], superior vena cava [SVC], and pulse generator housing [Can]) combined with coronary sinus (CS) electrodes. We hypothesized that a CS-->SVC+Can electrode configuration would have a lower atrial defibrillation threshold than a standard configuration for defibrillation, RV-->SVC+Can. We also tested the atrial defibrillation thresholds of five other configurations. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 closed chest sheep, we situated a two-coil (RV, SVC) defibrillation catheter, a left-pectoral subcutaneous Can, and a CS lead. Atrial fibrillation was burst induced and maintained with continuous infusion of intrapericardial acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride. Using fixed-tilt biphasic shocks, we determined the atrial defibrillation thresholds of seven test configurations in random order according to a multiple-reversal protocol. The peak voltage and delivered energy atrial defibrillation thresholds of CS-->SVC+Can (168+/-67 V, 2.68+/-2.40 J) were significantly lower than those of RV-->SVC+Can (215+/-88 V, 4.46+/-3.40 J). The atrial defibrillation thresholds of the other test configurations were RV+CS-->SVC+Can: 146+/-59 V, 1.92+/-1.45 J; RV-->CS+SVC+Can: 191+/-89 V, 3.53+/-3.19 J; CS-->SVC: 188+/-98 V, 3.77+/-4.14 J; SVC-->CS+ Can: 265+/-145 V, 7.37+/-9.12 J; and SVC-->Can: 516+/-209 V, 24.5+/-15.0 J. CONCLUSIONS: The atrial defibrillation threshold of CS-->SVC+Can is significantly lower than that of RV-->SVC+Can. In addition, the low atrial defibrillation threshold of RV+CS-->SVC+Can merits further investigation. Based on corroboration of low atrial defibrillation thresholds of CS-based configurations in humans, physicians might consider using CS leads with atrioventricular defibrillators. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |