Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy
| Autor: | Emile Thalabard, Jonathan Phillips, Edouard Machery, Markus Kneer, Christian Mott, Miklos Kurthy, Felipe Romero, Matteo Colombo, Xiang Zhou, Vilius Dranseika, Hanna Kim, Jordane Boudesseul, Antonio Gaitán Torres, Kevin Tobia, Brian D. Earp, Ivar R. Hannikainen, Mario Attie, Daniel A. Wilkenfeld, Brent Strickland, Aurélien Allard, James R. Beebe, Shen-yi Liao, Jan Sprenger, Anthony Lantian, Florian Cova, Noah van Dongen, Tania Moerenhout, José V. Hernández-Conde, Kareem Khalifa, Renatas Berniūnas, Wenjia Hu, Kevin Reuter, Angela Gaia Felicita Abatista, James Andow, François Jaquet, Mark Phelan, Hugo Viciana, Paulo Sousa, Fiery Cushman, Navin Rambharose, Rodrigo Díaz, Joshua Knobe |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Université Paris Nanterre - Département de Psychologie, Université Paris Nanterre (UPN), Tilburg Center for Logic, Ethics and Philosophy of Science |
| Předmět: |
Philosophy of mind
Social Psychology Applied psychology Replication Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Sample (statistics) Social and Behavioral Sciences 0603 philosophy ethics and religion 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Replication (statistics) Psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Experimental philosophy Reliability (statistics) ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS Reproducibility Philosophy of science 05 social sciences [SHS.PHIL]Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy 06 humanities and the arts Reliability engineering FOS: Psychology ddc:128.37 Philosophy 060302 philosophy optimal replication 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Scopus-Elsevier Review of Philosophy and Psychology Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2021, 12 (1), pp.9-44. ⟨10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9⟩ Review of Philosophy and Psychology (2018) pp. 1-36 Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12(1), 9-44. Springer Verlag |
| ISSN: | 1878-5158 |
| Popis: | For scientific theories grounded in empirical data, replicability is a core principle, for at least two reasons. First, unless we accept to have scientific theories rest on the authority of a small number of researchers, empirical studies should be replicable, in the sense that its methods and procedure should be detailed enough for someone else to conduct the same study. Second, for empirical results to provide a solid foundation for scientific theorizing, they should also be replicable, in the sense that most attempts at replicating the original study that produced them would yield similar results. The XPhi Replicability Project is primarily concerned with replicability in the second sense, that is: the replicability of results. In the past year, several projects have shed doubt on the replicability of key findings in psychology, and most notably social psychology. Because the methods of experimental philosophy have often been close to the ones used in social psychology, it is only natural to wonder to which extent the results experimental philosophers ground their theory are replicable. The aim of the XPhi Replicability Project is precisely to reach a reliable estimate of the replicability of empirical results in experimental philosophy. To this end, several research teams across the world will replicate around 40 studies in experimental philosophy, some among the most cited, others drawn at random. The results of the project will be published in a special issue of the Review of Philosophy and Psychology dedicated to the topic of replicability in cognitive science.The official website of the project can be found here :https://sites.google.com/site/thexphireplicabilityproject/homeThe project can also be followed on social medias:https://twitter.com/XPhiReplicationhttps://www.facebook.com/XPhiReplicabilityProject/ |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|