Evaluation of safety indicators for truck platooning
Autor: | Francesco Esposto, Arash Khabbaz Saberi, Jan-Pieter Paardekooper, Ellen van Nunen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Dynamics and Control, Mathematics and Computer Science |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Truck
Constant velocities Engineering Operations research Safety indicator IVS - Integrated Vehicle Safety Vehicle platoons 02 engineering and technology Functional Safety Transport engineering Time to collision Intelligent vehicle highway systems 0203 mechanical engineering Automated driving Vehicle to vehicle communications 0502 economics and business Brake False positive paradox Traffic Collision avoidance Functional safety 050210 logistics & transportation TS - Technical Sciences Industrial Innovation business.industry False negative rate 05 social sciences 020302 automobile design & engineering Vehicles V2V communications Collision safety indicators Fluid & Solid Mechanics Trucks Platoon Brakes business Emergency brake |
Zdroj: | 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 11-14 June 2017, Los Angeles, California, 1013-1018 STARTPAGE=1013;ENDPAGE=1018;TITLE=2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 11-14 June 2017, Los Angeles, California 28th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2017. 11 June 2017 through 14 June 2017, 1013-1018 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium |
Popis: | This paper addresses safety indicators for truck platooning at short inter-vehicle distances (with a time gap of 0.5 s). The aim of a safety indicator is to determine the correct moment for initiating a Collision Avoidance brake action to prevent a collision with the preceding truck in threatening situations. Three safety indicators are selected for an evaluation: the intended acceleration of the preceding truck, which is shared via Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication, the Brake Threat Number (BTN — based on simple vehicle models and an emergency brake assumption of the lead), and the Time-To-Collision (TTC — based on a constant velocity assumption). The latter two do not rely on V2V communication, but are obtained via on-board signals. Requirements for the amount of false negatives (missing a threatening situation) and the false positives (identifying a safe situation as threatening) are derived from a functional safety perspective. To find thresholds for the safety indicators that minimize the false negative rate, emergency brake tests are used. To evaluate the number of false positives, a set of data of two trucks driving in a platoon at 0.5 s at mixed-traffic highways in Belgium and the Netherlands, collected during 8 hours of automated driving in a platoon, is used. The results indicate that the communicated intended acceleration of the preceding truck might be able to distinguish safe and threatening situations in a vehicle platoon. Furthermore, for situations without V2V, both the BTN and the TTC are not capable to distinguish between threatening and safe situations. The amount of false positives found in the safe driving data-set does not fulfill the requirements derived from functional safety perspective. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |