Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia
Autor: | Patrick Meyfroidt, Nigel Asquith, Julie Subervie, Manon Authelet, Driss Ezzine-de-Blas |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech [Gembloux], Université de Liège, Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - UMR 5211 (CEE-M), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Earth and Life Institute [Louvain-La-Neuve] (ELI), Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University [Cambridge], Forêts et Sociétés (UPR Forêts et Sociétés), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), Département Environnements et Sociétés (Cirad-ES), Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research [F.R.S.-FNRS Grant n° 1.A.206.17F], grants from the UK Government's Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) program [grants NE/I00436X/1 and NE/L001470/1], Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - FRE2010 (CEE-M), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Bolivia
Economics and Econometrics Opportunity cost 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Sociology and Political Science Geography Planning and Development Sample (statistics) 010501 environmental sciences Development 01 natural sciences Ecosystem services [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences Order (exchange) Reciprocity (social psychology) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences 2. Zero hunger Planning and Development Public economics Geography business.industry 1. No poverty Participation Building and Construction 15. Life on land South America [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance Incentive Prosocial behavior Agriculture 8. Economic growth Business Incentive-based conservation program Motivations Forest conservation |
Zdroj: | World Development, Vol. 145, p. 105487 (2021) World Development World Development, Elsevier, 2021, 145, pp.105487. ⟨10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487⟩ |
ISSN: | 0305-750X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487⟩ |
Popis: | The effectiveness of incentive-based conservation programs depends on how they influence and interact with multiple motivations of the participants. Here, we studied an incentive-based program for forest conservation in Bolivia – called “Reciprocal Water Agreements” – that mixes material compensations with pro-social and pro-environmental motivations as a way to reduce crowding-out of intrinsic motivations and to increase participation. Based on a sample of 424 households who were offered the program, we analysed econometrically the households’ characteristics that influenced (i) the probability of participation in the program, (ii) the intensity of the participation, measured as the area allocated in the agreement, and (iii) the modality of participation, measured as the probability of participation in the different types of agreements. We found that economic factors favoured participation of better-off households owning property titles, more forested land with lower conservation opportunity cost, more agricultural tools and access to off-farm income. In addition, both pro-social factors – a deeper or older integration into social networks, and greater compliance to social norms of reciprocity, but also weaker institutional trust – as well as pro-environmental factors – including awareness of environmental problems, greater knowledge about solutions to environmental problems and a perceived positive balance of gains and losses in ecosystem services – also influenced positively the probability of participation and the area involved in the program. Finally, we found that participation into more restrictive agreements was enabled by a stronger sense of individual responsibility towards environmental problems and a weaker perceived control over environmental behaviours. Our results highlight the factors that could increase uptake and factors on which the program might focus in order to have a greater impact on pro-environmental behaviours. They also suggest that incentive-based program can be designed to take advantage of pro-social and pro-environmental motivations as strongly as of economic ones. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |