Development and Calibration of the PREMIUM Item Bank for Measuring Respect and Dignity for Patients with Severe Mental Illness

Autor: Fernandes, Sara, Fond, Guillaume, Zendjidjian, Xavier, Michel, Pierre, Baumstarck, Karine, Lançon, Christophe, Samalin, Ludovic, Llorca, Pierre-Michel, Coldefy, Magali, Auquier, Pascal, Boyer, Laurent, Collaborators of The French Premium, Group
Přispěvatelé: Centre d'études et de recherche sur les services de santé et la qualité de vie (CEReSS), Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Fondation FondaMental [Créteil], Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques (AMSE), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Economie de la Santé (IRDES), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Grant from the French National Program on the Performance of the Health-care System (PREPS, financed by Direction Generale de l'Offre de Soins, 14, avenue Duquesne, 75350 Paris, France), Agence Technique de l'Information sur l'Hospitalisation (ATIH)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 11 (6), pp.1644. ⟨10.3390/jcm11061644⟩
Journal of Clinical Medicine; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 1644
ISSN: 2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061644⟩
Popis: International audience; Most patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are paper-based, leading to a high burden for patients and care providers. The aim of this study was to (1) calibrate an item bank to measure patients’ experience of respect and dignity for adult patients with serious mental illnesses and (2) develop computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to improve the use of this PREM in routine practice. Patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder were enrolled in this multicenter and cross-sectional study. Psychometric analyses were based on classical test and item response theories and included evaluations of unidimensionality, local independence, and monotonicity; calibration and evaluation of model fit; analyses of differential item functioning (DIF); testing of external validity; and finally, CAT development. A total of 458 patients participated in the study. Of the 24 items, 2 highly inter-correlated items were deleted. Factor analysis showed that the remaining items met the unidimensional assumption (RMSEA = 0.054, CFI = 0.988, TLI = 0.986). DIF analyses revealed no biases by sex, age, care setting, or diagnosis. External validity testing has generally supported our assumptions. CAT showed satisfactory accuracy and precision. This work provides a more accurate and flexible measure of patients’ experience of respect and dignity than that obtained from standard questionnaires.
Databáze: OpenAIRE