Comparison of Diode Laser and Er:YAG Lasers in the Treatment of Ankyloglossia
| Autor: | Metin Güngörmüş, Mustafa Göregen, Mutan Hamdi Aras, Hayati Murat Akgül |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Adolescent medicine.drug_class medicine.medical_treatment Biomedical Engineering Short lingual frenulum Dentistry Lasers Solid-State Tongue Diseases law.invention law Tongue Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Local anesthesia Laser power scaling Lingual frenectomy Diode Pain Postoperative Lingual Frenum business.industry Local anesthetic Patient Acceptance of Health Care Laser medicine.anatomical_structure Female Lasers Semiconductor business Anesthesia Local |
| Zdroj: | Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 28:173-177 |
| ISSN: | 1557-8550 1549-5418 |
| DOI: | 10.1089/pho.2009.2498 |
| Popis: | Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerance of lingual frenectomy with regard to a local anesthesia requirement and comparison of postsurgical discomfort experienced by patients operated on with both diode and erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers. Background Ankyloglossia, commonly known as tongue-tie, is a congenital oral anomaly characterized by a short lingual frenulum. A short lingual frenulum may contribute to feeding, speech, and mechanical tongue problems. Methods Sixteen referred patients with tongue mobility complaints were included in this study. A GaAlAs laser device with a continuous wavelength of 808 nm was used in the diode group. Frenulums were incised by applying 2 W of laser power. The Er:YAG laser device with a continuous wavelength of 2940 nm was used in the Er:YAG group. Frenulums were incised by applying 1 W of laser power. The acceptability of the lingual frenectomy without local anesthesia and the degree of the postsurgical discomfort were evaluated. Results Although the majority of patients (six) could be operated on without local anesthesia in the Er:YAG group, all patients could not be operated on without local anesthetic agent in the diode group. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to pain, chewing, and speaking on the first or seventh day after surgery, whereas patients had more pain in the Er:YAG group than in the diode group the first 3 h after surgery. Conclusions The results indicate that only the Er:YAG laser can be used for lingual frenectomy without local anesthesia, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding the degree of the postsurgical discomfort except in the first 3 h. In conclusion, these results indicate that the Er:YAG laser is more advantageous than the diode laser in minor soft-tissue surgery because it can be performed without local anesthesia and with only topical anesthesia. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|