Qualitative research to improve RCT recruitment: issues arising in establishing research collaborations
| Autor: | Isabel O C de Salis, Jenny L Donovan, Zelda Tomlin, Merran Toerien |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Biomedical Research Alternative medicine law.invention Qualitative analysis Randomized controlled trial Informed consent law medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Cooperative Behavior Qualitative Research Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Medical education Informed Consent business.industry Patient Selection Delayed onset Community Participation General Medicine Focus group United Kingdom Clinical trial Research Design business Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Contemporary clinical trials. 29(5) |
| ISSN: | 1559-2030 |
| Popis: | Introduction Strategies to improve recruitment to RCTs (randomised controlled trials) are limited. The ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) study successfully developed a complex intervention based on qualitative research methods to increase recruitment rates. The Quartet study (Qualitative Research to Improve Recruitment to RCTs) was established to evaluate whether the ProtecT qualitative methods could be transferred into other RCTs. This paper reports on the barriers and facilitators in setting up these collaborations. Methods The Quartet study collaborated with five RCTs. Qualitative methods used were: interviews and focus groups with RCT staff; audio-recording recruitment interactions; and feedback sessions for RCT staff based on qualitative findings. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using content and thematic analyses. Issues arising during establishment of collaborations were recorded and analysed. Results Establishing collaborations proved challenging and not always surmountable. Difficulties were encountered in gaining agreement of RCT staff to participate because of central RCT staff's lack of authority over recruitment staff, poor communication within RCTs and recruiters' reluctance to have their practice scrutinised. The complexity of the recruitment process also hindered translation of ProtecT methods. Although Quartet enabled significant recruitment issues to surface, the bureaucratic tasks involved in securing governance approval delayed onset of collaborations, reducing the time to address issues and evaluate Quartet's impact. Discussion The Quartet study established collaborations with a range of RCTs and gained valuable insights for future collaborations between qualitative researchers and RCTs. Qualitative research methods need to be included at the feasibility stage of a RCT or fully integrated into the RCT, as in the ProtecT study, with routine audio-recording for monitoring and training purposes. Quartet-like collaborations could then be established without delay, and recruitment processes of RCTs could become transparent, monitored and improved. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect