Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
Autor: | Achiron, Asaf, Langenbucher, Achim, Szentmáry, Nóra, Cayless, Alan, Weisensee, Johannes, Fabian, Ekkehard, Wendelstein, Jascha, Hoffmann, Peter |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Optics and Photonics
Visual Acuity Intraocular Lens Implantation Standard deviation law.invention Nonlinear programming Cornea Root mean square 0302 clinical medicine law Medicine and Health Sciences Postoperative Period Limit (mathematics) Mathematics Lenses Intraocular Eye Lens Multidisciplinary Vision Tests Ophthalmic Procedures Optical Lenses Lens (optics) Data point Optical Equipment Biometrics Physical Sciences Medicine Engineering and Technology Anatomy Algorithms Research Article Optimization Biometry Science Ocular Anatomy Equipment Geometry Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures Research and Analysis Methods Refraction Ocular Cataract 03 medical and health sciences Ocular System Computational Techniques Humans Applied mathematics Phacoemulsification Biology and Life Sciences Radii 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Eyes Constant (mathematics) Head 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Test data |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0252102 (2021) |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Background To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. Methods The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against the SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1, simplified Haigis with 1 optimized constant and Haigis formula with 3 optimized constants. A large dataset of preoperative biometric values, lens power data and postoperative refraction data was split into training and test sets. The training data were used for formula constant optimization, and the test data for cross-validation. Constant optimization was performed for all formulae using nonlinear optimization, minimising root mean squared prediction error. Results The constants for all formulae were derived with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Applying these constants to the test data, the Castrop formula showed a slightly better performance compared to the classical formulae in terms of prediction error and absolute prediction error. Using the Castrop formula, the standard deviation of the prediction error was lowest at 0.45 dpt, and 95% of all eyes in the test data were within the limit of 0.9 dpt of prediction error. Conclusion The calculation concept of the Castrop formula and one potential option for optimization of the 3 Castrop formula constants (C, H, and R) are presented. In a large dataset of 1452 data points the performance of the Castrop formula was slightly superior to the respective results of the classical formulae such as SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1 or Haigis. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |