Effect of castration method and analgesia on inflammation, behavior, growth performance, and carcass traits in feedlot cattle
| Autor: | John T Richeson, H. D. Hughes, J. G. Powell, S. L. Roberts |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
040301 veterinary sciences Marbled meat Animal Health and Well Being Analgesic Thiazines Randomized block design Pain Inflammation Meloxicam Crossbreed 0403 veterinary science Random Allocation chemistry.chemical_compound Animal science Genetics medicine Animals Pain Management Analgesics Behavior Animal Haptoglobins business.industry Anti-Inflammatory Agents Non-Steroidal 0402 animal and dairy science 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences General Medicine 040201 dairy & animal science Thiazoles Castration chemistry Feedlot Cattle Animal Science and Zoology Analgesia medicine.symptom business Orchiectomy Food Science medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Animal Science. 96:66-75 |
| ISSN: | 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jas/skx022 |
| Popis: | Our objective was to determine the effect of castration timing, method, and use of the analgesic meloxicam (MEL) on inflammation, behavior, performance, and carcass traits in feedlot cattle. This study was a randomized complete block design conducted over a 3-yr period. In total, 194 crossbred beef calves from a single ranch origin were randomized at birth to receive one of five treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial: 1) bulls castrated within 48 h of birth (CON), 2) bulls surgically castrated on day 0 without MEL (SUR), 3) bulls surgically castrated on day 0 with MEL (SUR + MEL), 4) bulls band castrated on d 0 without MEL (BAN), and 5) bulls band castrated on day 0 with MEL (BAN + MEL). Upon feedlot arrival (day −11; average 287 ± 2.03 d of age), animals were blocked by initial BW (224 ± 4.5 kg) and assigned randomly to treatment pens in three consecutive years (n = 2 pens per treatment in each year). Oral MEL was administered at 1 mg/kg BW concurrent with applicable castration treatment on day 0. Data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS with pen (year) serving as experimental unit. From days 0 to 7, ADG was reduced (P = 0.01) for surgical (−0.42) compared to band (0.43 kg/d) castration. Conversely, ADG was increased for surgical (1.74) vs. band (1.46 kg/d) castration from days 14 to 32. There was also an overall (day 0 to final) improvement in ADG for MEL (P = 0.02), but no effect of castration method was observed (P = 0.81). The CON group had the greatest (P = 0.05) marbling score. Backfat thickness was increased (P = 0.01) for MEL. A treatment × day interaction (P = 0.04) existed for serum haptoglobin, with SUR having the greatest (P < 0.01) concentration on days 1 and 4. Meloxicam administered in the surgically castrated treatment reduced (P = 0.01) serum haptoglobin concentration on day 1. Relative to baseline, standing duration for surgical castration was increased 113 min (P < 0.01), while banding caused 6.7 more lying bouts (P < 0.01) immediately following castration on day 0. Step count was greatest for BAN, intermediate for CON, and least for surgical (P < 0.01). Results suggest that MEL mitigated the more pronounced inflammation observed for surgical castration, whereas behavior was differentially altered for castration method indicative of a divergent pain response. Castration, regardless of method, transiently reduced ADG, but MEL administration improved overall ADG for both methods. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|