Continuous versus intermittent administration of piperacillin–tazobactam in intensive care unit patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

Autor: Seyed Mohammadreza Hashemian, Payam Tabarsi, Arnavaz Akhzarmehr, Hamidreza Jamaati, Shadi Baniasadi, Arvin Najafi, Somayeh Ghafari, Fanak Fahimi
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
ISSN: 1998-359X
0972-5229
Popis: Background and Aims: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-acquired infection. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of continuous and intermittent administration of piperacillin-tazobactam by serial measurements of the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS). Subjects and Methods: Groups were designed as parallel and the study was designed as quasi-experimental and conducted at a semi-closed ICU between September 2008 and May 2010. Patients received 3.375 g (piperacillin 3 g/tazobactam 0.375 g) either through intermittent infusion every 6 h for 30 min [Intermittent Infusion (II) group; n = 30] or through continuous infusion every 8 h for 4 h [Continuous Infusion (CI) group; n = 31]. CPIS was used to assess the clinical diagnosis and outcome of VAP patients. Results: Sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II II score on ICU admission, diagnosis and underlying disease of VAP patients were not significantly different in the CI ( n = 31) and II ( n = 30) groups. Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, total number of antibiotics used per patient and duration of piperacillin/tazobactam treatment were similar in both groups. Mortality rates of VAP patients were similar between both groups during hospitalization. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes of patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam via CI or II when measured by serial CPIS score.
Databáze: OpenAIRE