Socialist hydropower governances compared: dams and resettlement as experienced by Dai and Thai societies from the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands

Autor: Sabrina Habich-Sobiegalla, Didier Orange, Nguyen Van Thiet, Jean-François Rousseau
Přispěvatelé: University of Ottawa [Ottawa], Ecologie fonctionnelle et biogéochimie des sols et des agro-écosystèmes (UMR Eco&Sols), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute (SFRI), Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences (VAAS), Free University of Berlin (FU), Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), International Development Research Center (IDRC), International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (Germany), Region Midi-Pyrenees, University of Toulouse 2, Province of Son La, French Embassy in Vietnam, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Regional Environmental Change
Regional Environmental Change, Springer Verlag, 2017, 17 (8), pp.2409-2419. ⟨10.1007/s10113-017-1170-0⟩
ISSN: 1436-3798
1436-378X
Popis: International audience; Research on hydropower development has shown that a diversity of social and environmental impacts of dams is distributed unevenly among various state and corporate actors and riparian populations. This article analyses how two neighbouring socialist states, China and Vietnam, govern dam-induced resettlement along their respective sections of the Red River Watershed. Our investigation focuses on resettlement villages created during the construction of the Madushan (China) and Ban Chat (Vietnam) reservoirs and testifies that resettlement policies on both sides of the border serve statist modernization agendas that fail to acknowledge Dai (China) and Thai (Vietnam) ethnic minority livelihoods. While local populations endure the greatest impacts from dam-induced changes in water allocation and the ensuing consequences for land resources, the benefits of hydropower development are first and foremost shared among state-owned and/or state-backed energy companies. These companies reap huge profits from their role as power generators for capitalist production, while also benefiting from state authorities underevaluating resettled communities' livelihood assets. A comparison of the two cases reveals that despite the border that separates China and Vietnam, and despite both states emphasizing different resettlement discourses, governance of dam-induced resettlement is strikingly similar.
Databáze: OpenAIRE