A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension

Autor: Dillon, Brian, Andrews, Caroline, Rotello, Caren, Wagers, Matthew
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
computational modeling
Signal Detection
Psychological

parsing
Social and Behavioral Sciences
computer.software_genre
Language and Linguistics
Sentence processing
Psycholinguistics
syntactic ambiguity
Argument
Models
Psychology
ROC
signal detection theory
media_common
Parsing
05 social sciences
Experimental Psychology
Ambiguity
Signal Detection
FOS: Psychology
Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics
Cognitive Sciences
Comprehension
Natural language processing
Sentence
Adult
Linguistics and Language
media_common.quotation_subject
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Models
Psychological

050105 experimental psychology
Young Adult
Humans
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
psycholinguistics
business.industry
Linguistics
sentence processing
ROCs
Reading comprehension
ROC Curve
Reading
FOS: Languages and literature
sentence comprehension
Psychological
Artificial intelligence
business
computer
Zdroj: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, vol 45, iss 7
DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/n2b4d
Popis: One perennially important question for theories of sentence comprehension is whether the human sentence processing mechanism is parallel (i.e., it simultaneously represents multiple syntactic analyses of linguistic input) or serial (i.e., it constructs only a single analysis at a time). Despite its centrality, this question has proven difficult to address for both theoretical and methodological reasons (Gibson & Pearlmutter, 2000; Lewis, 2000). In the present study, we reassess this question from a novel perspective. We investigated the well-known ambiguity advantage effect (Traxler, Pickering, & Clifton, 1998) in a speeded acceptability judgment task. We adopted a signal detection theoretic approach to these data, with the goal of determining whether speeded judgment responses were conditioned on one or multiple syntactic analyses. To link these results to incremental parsing models, we developed formal models to quantitatively evaluate how serial and parallel parsing models should impact perceived sentence acceptability in our task. Our results suggest that speeded acceptability judgments are jointly conditioned on multiple parses of the input, a finding that is overall more consistent with parallel parsing models than serial models. Our study thus provides a new, psychophysical argument for coactive parses during language comprehension. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Databáze: OpenAIRE