Barriers to Learning Clinical Reasoning: a Qualitative Study of Medicine Clerkship Students
| Autor: | Nicholas Duca, Nancy E. Adams, Susan A. Glod, Paul Haidet |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Response rate (survey)
Medical education 020205 medical informatics education Clinical reasoning Medicine (miscellaneous) Context (language use) 02 engineering and technology Focus group Education 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering 030212 general & internal medicine Psychology Clinical learning Working environment Original Research Healthcare system Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Med Sci Educ |
| ISSN: | 2156-8650 |
| Popis: | Clinical reasoning is crucial to good patient care, but both learning and applying clinical reasoning skills in the context of a complex working environment can be challenging. We sought to understand the perceived barriers to learning clinical reasoning, as experienced by internal medicine clerkship students at our institution. We invited internal medicine clerkship students to participate in focus groups to discuss their experiences with and barriers to learning clinical reasoning. A survey was administered to gather additional responses. Responses were reviewed, coded, and synthesized to identify key themes. Twenty-nine medicine clerkship students (male = 14, female = 15) participated in six 60-minute focus groups, and 121 (61% response rate) students responded to the barriers to clinical reasoning survey from March 2018 to May 2019. We identified three themes (clerkship acclimation, data access, and practice optimization) and ten subthemes as aspects of the clerkship environment that impacted students' ability to develop clinical reasoning skills. Students identified barriers to learning clinical reasoning during the internal medicine clerkship. The themes "clerkship acclimation" and "data access" were identified as prerequisites to clinical reasoning while the theme "practice optimization" described key components of the deliberate practice of clinical reasoning. Educators and health systems may improve the development of clinical reasoning by recognizing and overcoming these barriers within clinical learning environments. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink