Mitigation potential and environmental impact of centralized versus distributed BECCS with domestic biomass production in Great Britain
Autor: | Pei-Hao Li, Isabella Butnar, Fabrizio Albanito, Simon Taylor, Nuala Fitton, Mark Richards, Raphael Slade, Pete Smith, Dave Bell, Michael Martin, Niall Mac Dowell, Astley Hastings |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Technology
MISCANTHUS Energy & Fuels Natural resource economics lcsh:TJ807-830 lcsh:Renewable energy sources 010501 environmental sciences BIOFUEL lcsh:HD9502-9502.5 01 natural sciences land-use change LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS CARBON future energy scenarios Bioenergy greenhouse gases BECCS Land use land-use change and forestry Environmental impact assessment bioenergy crops Waste Management and Disposal 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Science & Technology GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS Land use Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment AVAILABILITY Carbon capture and storage (timeline) Agriculture Forestry Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage carbon capture and storage 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences Agronomy lcsh:Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade MODEL agricultural GHG emissions Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology Work (electrical) Greenhouse gas 040103 agronomy & agriculture 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Environmental science climate mitigation strategy Life Sciences & Biomedicine ENERGY CROPS Agronomy and Crop Science 1001 Agricultural Biotechnology |
Zdroj: | GCB Bioenergy, Vol 11, Iss 10, Pp 1234-1252 (2019) |
ISSN: | 1757-1693 1757-1707 |
Popis: | New contingency policy plans are expected to be published by the United Kingdom government to set out urgent actions, such as carbon capture and storage, greenhouse gas removal and the use of sustainable bioenergy to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets of the 4th and 5th Carbon Budgets. In this study, we identify two plausible bioenergy production pathways for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) based on centralized and distributed energy systems to show what BECCS could look like if deployed by 2050 in Great Britain. The extent of agricultural land available to sustainably produce biomass feedstock in the centralized and distributed energy systems is about 0.39 and 0.5 Mha, providing approximately 5.7 and 7.3 MtDM/year of biomass respectively. If this land‐use change occurred, bioenergy crops would contribute to reduced agricultural soil GHG emission by 9 and 11 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0001/year in the centralized and distributed energy systems respectively. In addition, bioenergy crops can contribute to reduce agricultural soil ammonia emissions and water pollution from soil nitrate leaching, and to increase soil organic carbon stocks. The technical mitigation potentials from BECCS lead to projected CO2 reductions of approximately 18 and 23 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0002/year from the centralized and distributed energy systems respectively. This suggests that the domestic supply of sustainable biomass would not allow the emission reduction target of 50 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0003/year from BECCS to be met. To meet that target, it would be necessary to produce solid biomass from forest systems on 0.59 or 0.49 Mha, or alternatively to import 8 or 6.6 MtDM/year of biomass for the centralized and distributed energy system respectively. The spatially explicit results of this study can serve to identify the regional differences in the potential capture of CO2 from BECCS, providing the basis for the development of onshore CO2 transport infrastructures. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |