Mitigation potential and environmental impact of centralized versus distributed BECCS with domestic biomass production in Great Britain

Autor: Pei-Hao Li, Isabella Butnar, Fabrizio Albanito, Simon Taylor, Nuala Fitton, Mark Richards, Raphael Slade, Pete Smith, Dave Bell, Michael Martin, Niall Mac Dowell, Astley Hastings
Přispěvatelé: Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Technology
MISCANTHUS
Energy & Fuels
Natural resource economics
lcsh:TJ807-830
lcsh:Renewable energy sources
010501 environmental sciences
BIOFUEL
lcsh:HD9502-9502.5
01 natural sciences
land-use change
LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS
CARBON
future energy scenarios
Bioenergy
greenhouse gases
BECCS
Land use
land-use change and forestry

Environmental impact assessment
bioenergy crops
Waste Management and Disposal
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Science & Technology
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS
Land use
Renewable Energy
Sustainability and the Environment

AVAILABILITY
Carbon capture and storage (timeline)
Agriculture
Forestry
Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage
carbon capture and storage
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Agronomy
lcsh:Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade
MODEL
agricultural GHG emissions
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
Work (electrical)
Greenhouse gas
040103 agronomy & agriculture
0401 agriculture
forestry
and fisheries

Environmental science
climate mitigation strategy
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
ENERGY CROPS
Agronomy and Crop Science
1001 Agricultural Biotechnology
Zdroj: GCB Bioenergy, Vol 11, Iss 10, Pp 1234-1252 (2019)
ISSN: 1757-1693
1757-1707
Popis: New contingency policy plans are expected to be published by the United Kingdom government to set out urgent actions, such as carbon capture and storage, greenhouse gas removal and the use of sustainable bioenergy to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets of the 4th and 5th Carbon Budgets. In this study, we identify two plausible bioenergy production pathways for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) based on centralized and distributed energy systems to show what BECCS could look like if deployed by 2050 in Great Britain. The extent of agricultural land available to sustainably produce biomass feedstock in the centralized and distributed energy systems is about 0.39 and 0.5 Mha, providing approximately 5.7 and 7.3 MtDM/year of biomass respectively. If this land‐use change occurred, bioenergy crops would contribute to reduced agricultural soil GHG emission by 9 and 11 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0001/year in the centralized and distributed energy systems respectively. In addition, bioenergy crops can contribute to reduce agricultural soil ammonia emissions and water pollution from soil nitrate leaching, and to increase soil organic carbon stocks. The technical mitigation potentials from BECCS lead to projected CO2 reductions of approximately 18 and 23 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0002/year from the centralized and distributed energy systems respectively. This suggests that the domestic supply of sustainable biomass would not allow the emission reduction target of 50 urn:x-wiley:17571693:media:gcbb12630:gcbb12630-math-0003/year from BECCS to be met. To meet that target, it would be necessary to produce solid biomass from forest systems on 0.59 or 0.49 Mha, or alternatively to import 8 or 6.6 MtDM/year of biomass for the centralized and distributed energy system respectively. The spatially explicit results of this study can serve to identify the regional differences in the potential capture of CO2 from BECCS, providing the basis for the development of onshore CO2 transport infrastructures.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje