Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon
Autor: | Roberto Miano, Giuseppe Vespasiani, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Camille Mugnier, Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos, Enrico Spera |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy medicine.medical_treatment Urology Settore MED/24 - Urologia Prostate cancer Internal medicine Biopsy medicine Humans Peripheral Nerves Prospective Studies Laparoscopy Aged Neoplasm Staging Prostatectomy medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Prostatic Neoplasms Recovery of Function Robotics Middle Aged Hepatology Prognosis medicine.disease Single surgeon Logistic Models Treatment Outcome General Surgery Multivariate Analysis Surgery Neoplasm Grading business Organ Sparing Treatments Follow-Up Studies Abdominal surgery |
Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy. 27:4297-4304 |
ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-013-3046-9 |
Popis: | This study aimed to compare the pentafecta rates between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) and to identify prognostic factors predicting the pentafecta for each technique.This prospective comparative study enrolled 248 consecutive male patients 70 years of age or younger with clinically localized prostate cancer [PCa: age ≤ 70 years, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score ≤ 7] who were fully continent, potent, and candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) LRP or RALP. The pentafecta rates between LRP and RALP were compared. A logistic regression model was created to evaluate independent factors for achieving pentafecta.In the final analysis, 91 LRP and 136 RALP patients were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 21 months for the 91 LRP patients and 18 months for the 136 RALP patients (p = 0.07). Of the 227 patients, 87 reached pentafecta [25 LRP patients (27.5 %) vs 62 RALP patients (45.6 %), p = 0.006]. Of the 140 patients who failed pentafecta, 90 (64.3 %) missed a single parameter. In these cases, erectile deficit was the leading cause of pentafecta failure, with a significant [corrected] difference between groups (80 % LRP cases that missed potency recovery [corrected] vs 53.3 % RALP, p = 0.007). Lower age, lower pathologic stage, and RALP are significantly associated with pentafecta as independent factors. For the pT3 disease, the two techniques did not differ significantly.Patients submitted to BNS RP have low possibilities of achieving pentafecta. Use of the robotic platform by a single surgeon significantly enhances the possibility of achieving pentafecta independently of age and pathologic stage. Potency was the most difficult outcome to reach after surgery, and it was the main factor leading to pentafecta failure. LRP and RALP provide equivalent pentafecta rates for the pT3 disease and similar "tetrafecta" outcomes when potency recovery is not included among the postoperative expectations of the patient. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |