Dental patient reported outcome and oral health-related quality of life measures: protocol for a systematic evidence map of reviews
| Autor: | Darragh Beecher, Zelda Di Blasi, Patrice James, Mairead Harding, Helen Whelton, John Browne |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Quality of life
Open science Oral health Oral health related quality of life Social and Behavioral Sciences Oral-health-related quality of life Article 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Psychology Research synthesis protocol 030212 general & internal medicine Dental epidemiology General Dentistry Protocol (science) Medical education Health Psychology 030503 health policy & services FOS: Clinical medicine Guideline Grey literature Dental patients Dental patient reported outcome measures (dPROMs) lcsh:RK1-715 FOS: Psychology stomatognathic diseases dPROMs Systematic review lcsh:Dentistry Dental Epidemiology Dentistry Patient-reported outcome 0305 other medical science |
| Zdroj: | BDJ Open DOAJ-Articles Cork Open Research Archive PubMed Central BDJ Open, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021) |
| Popis: | Aims This research synthesis protocol addresses the question: what is the evidence concerning measurement properties of dental patient reported outcome measures (dPROMs), and regarding the real-world value of dPROMs, and where are the gaps in this evidence? Evidence mapping will systematically examine reviews of quantitative dPROMs used to assess the impact of oral health on the quality of life of dental patients and research participants. Evidence gaps where future research or systematic reviews are required will be identified. Materials and methods This protocol accords with the PRISMA-P guideline. Open Science Framework Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RZD3N. Biomedical and grey literature databases will be searched, adapting the same search strategy. Published or unpublished reviews evaluating any dPROM will be considered for inclusion. There will be no restriction by date, setting, or language. AMSTAR2 and ROBIS will evaluate risk of bias. Psychometric criteria will be adapted from COSMIN. Data will be summarised separately for specific populations and conditions. Discussion The findings will enable clinicians and researchers to identify methodologically robust dPROMs, appropriate for use with relevant populations and conditions. Implications for real-world practice and research will be discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|