Comparative Performance of a Novel Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Using a Targeted Chain Oligopeptide, Peptide 55▿
Autor: | P. J. Vallely, A.M. Al-Sulaiman, Paul E. Klapper |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2009 |
Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
Herpesvirus 2 Human Clinical Biochemistry Immunology Peptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay medicine.disease_cause Antibodies Viral Sensitivity and Specificity Immunoglobulin G Epitope Serology Western blot Viral Envelope Proteins medicine Immunology and Allergy Clinical Laboratory Immunology Humans chemistry.chemical_classification biology medicine.diagnostic_test Immunodominant Epitopes Herpes Simplex Virology Molecular biology Blot Herpes simplex virus chemistry biology.protein Antibody Oligopeptides |
Popis: | Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein G (gG2) has been used as the basis of many serological assays for the detection of HSV type 2 (HSV-2)-specific antibodies. In the present study, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the Pathozyme Viro HSV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) ELISA (Omega Diagnostics, Alva, United Kingdom), based on an immunodominant epitope of gG2 presented in a branched-chain format (peptide 55), was compared with two commercially available gG2-specific assays, the Bioelisa HSV-2 IgG assay (Biokit, S.A., Barcelona, Spain) and the HerpesSelect HSV-2 IgG assay (Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). A panel of 218 well-characterized serum samples was tested. Thirty-one samples were determined to be HSV-2 IgG antibody positive and 164 samples were determined to be negative with all three kits. The levels of concordance between the tests were 95.9% between the Omega and HerpeSelect assays, 90.8% between the Omega and Bioelisa assays, and 94.5% between the HerpeSelect and Bioelisa assays. Twenty-three samples gave discordant results. Western blot results showed that of these, the results for 77% were correctly identified by the Omega assay, the results for 68% were correctly identified by the HerpeSelect assay, and the results for 13.6% were correctly identified by the Bioelisa assay. Although there was a high level of agreement between the results obtained by the three assays and no false-positive results were detected by any of the three kits, confirmation of the results for samples with discordant results by Western blotting suggested that the peptide 55-based Omega assay is the most sensitive and specific assay among the assays evaluated. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |