Inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth in Australia: A scoping review
Autor: | Roslyn Elizabeth Donnellan-Fernandez, Linda Sweet, Tija Blums |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
Related factors
Medical education medicine.medical_specialty 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine 030504 nursing Public health Australia Obstetrics and Gynecology English language Guideline Midwifery Parity 03 medical and health sciences Health services 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy Political science Maternity and Midwifery Inclusion and exclusion criteria medicine Humans Female 0305 other medical science Home Childbirth |
Zdroj: | Women and Birth. 35:23-30 |
ISSN: | 1871-5192 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.009 |
Popis: | Background There are fifteen publicly-funded homebirth programs currently operating in Australia. Suitability for these programs is determined by a series of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Aim The aim of this scoping review is to identify common inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth programs and other related factors that affect access to these programs. Methods A Google search was conducted for publicly-funded homebirth programs listed on the National Publicly-funded Homebirth Consortium website. Public websites, documents, and policies were analysed to identify inclusion and exclusion criteria for these programs. Findings Eleven of the 15 publicly-funded homebirth programs mention the availability of homebirth on their health service website, with varying levels of information about the inclusion and exclusion criteria available. Two of the programs with no information on their health service website are covered by a state-wide guideline. Additional details were sought directly from programs and obtaining further information from some individual homebirth programs was challenging. Variation in inclusion and exclusion criteria exists between programs. Common areas of variation include restrictions relating to Body Mass Index, parity, age, English language ability, tests required during pregnancy, and gestation at booking to the homebirth program. Conclusion The inclusion and exclusion criteria for a publicly-funded homebirth program determines women’s access to the program. Limited publicly available information regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria for many publicly-funded homebirth programs is likely to limit women’s awareness of and access to these programs. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |