Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnel drilling preference among orthopaedic surgeons

Autor: Orr Limpisvasti, Neal S. ElAttrache, Brian J. Cole, Eric N. Bowman, Thomas H. Freeman
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: The Knee. 29
ISSN: 1873-5800
Popis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique for femoral tunnel drilling varies substantially, each with advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this study was to define ACLR femoral tunnel technique predilection among surgeons and to explore factors associated with their preference.An 11-question survey regarding ACLR femoral tunnel technique was completed by 560 AANA/AOSSM members. Surgeon and practice demographics and residency and fellowship experiences were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable models for association with surgeon preference.In current practice, 55% of surgeons prefer anteromedial (AM) portal drilling, 32% retrograde, and 14% transtibial (TT). Sports Medicine fellowship experience was the strongest predictor of current practice (p 0.001), followed by residency technique (p = 0.014). A significant increase in TT drilling was noted for those practicing15 years TT (29% vs 3%, p 0.001), with an inverse relationship for retrograde drilling (38% vs 21%, p 0.001). Number of ACLRs/year and percent Sports specific practice were significant predictors for AM drilling (p 0.001). Though less than AM and retrograde, TT was more common for those in private practice (17% vs 8%, p 0.001), and more prevalent in the Midwest/Southeast (19% vs 10%, p = 0.003). Non-significant predictors included highest level of athlete for whom an ACLR had been performed, level of athlete serving as team physician, and Certificate of Added Qualifications status.Surgeon training, practice setting, and years in practice significantly predict preference for femoral tunnel drilling technique. Surgeon comfort and confidence in attaining an anatomic reconstruction should drive choice of technique.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: