STATUTE OF LIMITATION - Old doubts and new questions

Autor: Bukovac Puvača, Maja, Mihelčić, Gabrijela, Marochini Zrinski, Maša
Jazyk: chorvatština
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci
Volume 43
Issue 3
ISSN: 1846-8314
1330-349X
Popis: U radu je analiziran poseban aspekt nacionalnoga zastarnog režima u svjetlu povrede prava na pristup sudu kao podoblika prava na pošteno suđenje zajamčenog čl. 6. st. 1. Konvencije. Praksa uz Konvenciju i zaštita pružena konvencijskim pravima, pa i navedenom vidu prava na pošteno suđenje u građanskim stvarima, pokazuje da se o zastari kao ograničenju koje nije opravdano odnosno nije razmjerno, legitimno i predvidljivo može govoriti u vezi s uređenjem zastare zahtjeva za naknadu neimovinske štete zbog povreda zdravlja. Proširi li država svoje polje slobodne procjene uređenjem početka tijeka i duljine zastarnog roka ovih tražbina i time pojedincu (oštećeniku) nametne prekomjeran teret dolazi do uspostavljanja uzročne veze. Riječ je o konvencijskoj uzročnoj vezi koju utjelovljuje propuštanje države postupati u skladu sa svojim konvencijskim obvezama. Najvažnije pitanje koje je postavljeno o razmjernosti ograničenja jest uređenje trenutka saznanja za štetu i štetnika kao početka tijeka subjektivnog roka zastare zahtjeva za naknadu štete i s tim u vezi trajanje roka računatog od toga trenutka, pa je u radu ono detaljno analizirano u potrazi za odgovorom o razmjernosti nacionalnog uređenja i moguće povrede prava na pristup sudu te njegova odnosa spram načela pravne sigurnosti.
The paper analyses a specific aspect of the national statute of limitations in the light of violation of the right of access to court as a form of the right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention. The Convention case-law and the protection provided to Convention rights, including the mentioned form of the right to fair trial in civil matters, shows that the statute of limitations can be discussed as a limitation that is not justified, i.e. proportionate, legitimate and predictable, in connection with the regulation of the statute of limitations for claims for compensation for non-pecuniary loss due to health injuries. If the state expands its margin of appreciation by regulating the beginning and the length of the limitation period for these claims and thus imposes excessive burden on the individual (the victim), a causal link will be established. This represents a Convention causal link embodied by the state’s failure to act in accordance with its obligations under the Convention. The most important question that has been raised regarding the proportionality of limitation is regulation of the moment of learning about the damage and the victim as the beginning of the course of subjective time limit for the statute of limitation of the claim for compensation and in this connection the duration of the time limit calculated from that moment. For that reason, this question has been analysed in detail in search for an answer regarding the proportionality of national regulation and possible violation of the right of access to a court and its relation to the principle of legal certainty.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: