Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vs. non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018

Autor: Tyler J. Fraum, Allan Tsung, Muhammad Naeem, Roberto Cannella, Anup S. Shetty, Richard Tsai, Amber Salter, Daniel R. Ludwig, Alessandro Furlan, Kathryn J. Fowler, Maverick LeBlanc, Amir A. Borhani, David H. Ballard
Přispěvatelé: Ludwig D.R., Fraum T.J., Cannella R., Ballard D.H., Tsai R., Naeem M., LeBlanc M., Salter A., Tsung A., Shetty A.S., Borhani A.A., Furlan A., Fowler K.J.
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Cirrhosis
Carcinoma
Hepatocellular

Urology
Malignancy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Article
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
Image Interpretation
Computer-Assisted

medicine
Humans
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

In patient
Liver imaging
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Aged
80 and over

Cirrhosi
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
business.industry
Liver Neoplasms
Gastroenterology
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective cohort study
Hepatology
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Interrater reliability
digestive system diseases
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA)
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cohort
LI-RADS
Female
Radiology
business
Tomography
X-Ray Computed

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
Algorithms
Zdroj: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Popis: PURPOSE: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was created to standardize the diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and has undergone multiple revisions including a recent update in 2018 (v2018). The primary aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance and interrater reliability (IRR) of LI-RADS v2018 for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary hepatic malignancy in patients ‘at-risk’ for HCC. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of changes introduced in the v2018 diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study combined a 10-year experience of pathologically-proven primary liver malignancies from two large liver transplant centers. Two blinded readers independently evaluated each lesion and assigned a LI-RADS diagnostic category, additionally scoring all relevant imaging features. Changes in category based on the reader-provided features and the new v2018 criteria were assessed by a study coordinator. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 105 HCCs and 73 non-HCC primarily liver malignancies. LI-RADS had a high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC (89% and 90% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively), and IRR was moderate to substantial for final LI-RADS category and most features. Revision of the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in very few changes (5 [2.8%] and 3 [1.7%] for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively) in overall lesion classification. CONCLUSION: LI-RADS diagnostic categories and features had moderate to substantial IRR and high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy. Revision of LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in reclassification of very few lesions.
Databáze: OpenAIRE