Five paradigms of collective action underlying the human dimension of conservation
| Autor: | Katherine Homewood, Laurent Mermet, Raphaël Billé, Andrew Dobson |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | AgroParisTech, Centre de recherche sens, ethique, société (CERSES - UMR 8137), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Department of Anthropology [University College of London], University College of London [London] (UCL), Keele University [Keele], Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales (IDDRI), Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Paris, D. W. Macdonald, K. J. Willis, Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Conservation actions 010501 environmental sciences Collective action 010603 evolutionary biology 01 natural sciences [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences Government paradigm Political science East africa Social science Ecosystem 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Government Human Dimension Conservation biology Corporate governance 15. Life on land Epistemology Revolution paradigm Action (philosophy) Community-based conservation [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences co-ordination paradigm Governance paradigm Minority action paradigm |
| Zdroj: | Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2 D. W. Macdonald; K. J. Willis. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, John Wiley & Sons, pp.42-58, 2013, 9780470658765. ⟨10.1002/9781118520178.ch3⟩ D. W. Macdonald; K. J. Willis. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, John Wiley & Sons, pp.42-58, 2013, 9780470658765. 〈10.1002/9781118520178.ch3〉 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/9781118520178.ch3⟩ |
| Popis: | International audience; This chapter focuses on the question of collective action addressing the human dimension of conservation: ethical, cultural, and social. The first part of the chapter explains the five fundamental paradigms of collective action that underpin both lay and academic discourses on action for conservation. The paradigms are government paradigm, co-ordination paradigm, revolution paradigm, governance paradigm, and minority action paradigm. The second part of the chapter provides an illustration of such clarification. It introduces current controversies about community based conservation in Africa-more particularly, in East Africa's Maasailand-and show how the five-paradigms model proposed can shed light on them. The chapter ends with a discussion of some possible misunderstandings hindering the effort to work on collective action across conservation biology and social sciences, and offers some suggestions for further learning and research. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|