In Situ Medical Simulation Investigation of Emergency Department Procedural Sedation With Randomized Trial of Experimental Bedside Clinical Process Guidance Intervention
| Autor: | Krister Olsson, Rakan S. Al-Rasheed, Jennifer A. Dunbar-Viveiros, Leo Kobayashi, David Portelli, Gregory D. Jay, Jeffrey Devine, Fenwick G. Gardiner, Mark S. Jones, Frank Overly, Max Dannecker, John Gosbee, Nathan A. Siegel, Stella Lai |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Epidemiology Resuscitation Sedation Decision Making Graduate medical education Medicine (miscellaneous) Education law.invention Patient safety Randomized controlled trial law medicine Safety behaviors Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives Simulation Training business.industry Internship and Residency Emergency department medicine.disease Checklist Modeling and Simulation Informatics Female Patient Safety Medical emergency medicine.symptom Emergency Service Hospital business |
| Zdroj: | Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 10:146-153 |
| ISSN: | 1559-2332 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/sih.0000000000000083 |
| Popis: | Introduction Patient safety during emergency department procedural sedation (EDPS) can be difficult to study. Investigators sought to delineate and experimentally assess EDPS performance and safety practices of senior-level emergency medicine residents through in situ simulation. Methods Study sessions used 2 pilot-tested EDPS scenarios with critical action checklists, institutional forms, embedded probes, and situational awareness questionnaires. An experimental informatics system was separately developed for bedside EDPS process guidance. Postgraduate year 3 and 4 subjects completed both scenarios in randomized order; only experimental subjects were provided with the experimental system during second scenarios. Results Twenty-four residents were recruited into a control group (n = 12; 6.2 ± 7.4 live EDPS experience) and experimental group (n = 12; 11.3 ± 8.2 live EDPS experience [P = 0.10]). Critical actions for EDPS medication selection, induction, and adverse event recognition with resuscitation were correctly performed by most subjects. Presedation evaluations, sedation rescue preparation, equipment checks, time-outs, and documentation were frequently missed. Time-outs and postsedation assessments increased during second scenarios in the experimental group. Emergency department procedural sedation safety probe detection did not change across scenarios in either group. Situational awareness scores were 51% ± 7% for control group and 58% ± 12% for experimental group. Subjects using the experimental system completed more time-outs and scored higher Simulation EDPS Safety Composite Scores, although without comprehensive improvements in EDPS practice or safety. Conclusions Study simulations delineated EDPS and assessed safety behaviors in senior emergency medicine residents, who exhibited the requisite medical knowledge base and procedural skill set but lacked some nontechnical skills that pertain to emergency department microsystem functions and patient safety. The experimental system exhibited limited impact only on in-simulation time-out compliance. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|