Combined analysis and validation for DNA methylation and gene expression profiles associated with prostate cancer
Autor: | Yang Song, Yanqiu Tong, Shixiong Deng |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Cancer Research
Microarray Bioinformatics Computational biology Differentially expressed gene Biology lcsh:RC254-282 03 medical and health sciences Prostate cancer 0302 clinical medicine Gene expression Genetics medicine KEGG lcsh:QH573-671 Gene DNA methylation lcsh:Cytology ALPL Cancer medicine.disease lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Primary Research |
Zdroj: | Cancer Cell International, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-23 (2019) Cancer Cell International |
ISSN: | 1475-2867 |
Popis: | Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is a malignancy cause of cancer deaths and frequently diagnosed in male. This study aimed to identify tumor suppressor genes, hub genes and their pathways by combined bioinformatics analysis. Methods A combined analysis method was used for two types of microarray datasets (DNA methylation and gene expression profiles) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differentially methylated genes (DMGs) were identified by the R package minfi and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened out via the R package limma. A total of 4451 DMGs and 1509 DEGs, identified with nine overlaps between DMGs, DEGs and tumor suppressor genes, were screened for candidate tumor suppressor genes. All these nine candidate tumor suppressor genes were validated by TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database and Oncomine database. And then, the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed by DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) database. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed by STRING and visualized in Cytoscape. At last, Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to validate these genes. Results The candidate tumor suppressor genes were IKZF1, PPM1A, FBP1, SMCHD1, ALPL, CASP5, PYHIN1, DAPK1 and CASP8. By validation in TCGA database, PPM1A, DAPK1, FBP1, PYHIN1, ALPL and SMCHD1 were significant. The hub genes were FGFR1, FGF13 and CCND1. These hub genes were identified from the PPI network, and sub-networks revealed by these genes were involved in significant pathways. Conclusion In summary, the study indicated that the combined analysis for identifying target genes with PCa by bioinformatics tools promote our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and underlying the development of PCa. And the hub genes might serve as molecular targets and diagnostic biomarkers for precise diagnosis and treatment of PCa. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0753-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |