The Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI), a collaborative paradigm for institutional and human resources capacity building between high- and low- and middle-income countries: the Mozambique experience
Autor: | Robert T. Schooley, Carla Carrilho, Mamudo R. Ismail, Alcido Nguenha, Constance A. Benson, Emilia Virginia Noormahomed, Sérgio Noormahomed, Ana Olga Mocumbi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Economic growth
Capacity Building 020205 medical informatics International Cooperation 02 engineering and technology North–South collaboration 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Political science 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Cooperative Behavior Human resources Developing Countries Mozambique Medical education Education Medical business.industry lcsh:Public aspects of medicine Health Policy Developed Countries Research Middle income countries 1. No poverty Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Capacity building lcsh:RA1-1270 Medical Education Partnership Initiative Low and middle income countries Paradigm shift General partnership Research-Article South–South collaboration business High income countries |
Zdroj: | Global Health Action Global Health Action, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2017) |
ISSN: | 1654-9880 |
Popis: | Background: Collaborations among researchers based in lower and middle income countries (LMICs) and high income countries (HICs) have made major discoveries related to diseases disproportionately affecting LMICs and have been vital to the development of research communities in LMICs. Such collaborations have generally been scientifically and structurally driven by HICs. Objectives: In this report we outline a paradigm shift in collaboration, exemplified by the Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI), in which the formulation of priorities and administrative infrastructure reside in the LMIC. Methods: This descriptive report outlines the critical features of the MEPI partnership. Results: In the MEPI, LMIC program partners translate broad program goals and define metrics into priorities that are tailored to local conditions. Program funds flow to a LMIC-based leadership group that contracts with peers from HICs to provide technical and scientific advice and consultation in a 'reverse funds flow' model. Emphasis is also placed on strengthening administrative capacity within LMIC institutions. A rigorous monitoring and evaluation process modifies program priorities on the basis of evolving opportunities to maximize program impact. Conclusions: Vesting LMIC partners with the responsibility for program leadership, and building administrative and fiscal capacity in LMIC institutions substantially enhances program relevance, impact and sustainability. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |