Variation in costs of cone beam CT examinations among healthcare systems
Autor: | Christell, Helena, Birch, Stephen, Hedesiu, Mihaela, Horner, Keith, Ivanauskaité, Deimante, Nackaerts, Olivia, Rohlin, Madeleine, Lindh, Christina, SEDENTEXCT consortium |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
Cone beam computed tomography
Cuspid Dentistry diagnostic Odontologi Patient Care Planning 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Indirect costs 0302 clinical medicine Belgium Cost of Illness Maxilla Radiography Dental Wisdom tooth Child health care economics and organizations media_common Aged 80 and over Tooth Impacted General Medicine Health Care Costs cone beam computed tomography Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Middle Aged 3. Good health medicine.anatomical_structure Costs and Cost Analysis Health Resources Healthcare system Adult Financing Personal Adolescent costs and cost analysis Direct Service Costs 03 medical and health sciences Tooth Loss Young Adult medicine media_common.cataloged_instance Capital cost Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Operations management European Union European union General Dentistry Cone beam ct Aged Sweden business.industry Romania Research Lithuania 030206 dentistry Otorhinolaryngology Capital equipment Tooth Extraction oral health Molar Third business Delivery of Health Care |
Popis: | Objectives: To analyse the costs of cone beam CT (CBCT) in different healthcare systems for patients with different clinical conditions. Methods: Costs were calculated for CBCT performed in Cluj (Romania), Leuven (Belgium), Malmö (Sweden) and Vilnius (Lithuania) on patients with (i) a maxillary canine with eruption disturbance, (ii) an area with tooth loss prior to implant treatment or (iii) a lower wisdom tooth planned for removal. The costs were calculated using an approach based on the identification, measurement and valuation of all resources used in the delivery of the service that combined direct costs (capital equipment, accommodation, labour) with indirect costs (patients’ and accompanying persons’ time, ‘‘out of pocket’’ costs for examination fee and visits). Results: The estimates for direct and indirect costs varied among the healthcare systems, being highest in Malmö and lowest in Leuven. Variation in direct costs was mainly owing to different capital costs for the CBCT equipment arising from differences in purchase prices(range J148 000–227 000). Variation in indirect costs were mainly owing to examination fees (range J0–102.02). Conclusions: Cost analysis provides an important input for economic evaluations of diagnostic methods in different healthcare systems and for planning of service delivery. Additionally, it enables decision-makers to separate variations in costs between systems into those due to external influences and those due to policy decisions. A cost evaluation of a dental radiographic method cannot be generalized from one healthcare system to another, but must take into account these specific circumstances. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |