COMBINAÇÃO DE DIFERENTES MÉTODOS DE TREINO CONCORRENTES EM IDOSOS COM SÍNDROME METABÓLICA

Autor: Marco Antônio R. Da Silva, Elias de França, Liliana C. Baptista, Rafael S. Neves, Helena Loureiro, Erico C. Caperuto, Manuel T. Veríssimo, Raul A. Martins
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, Volume: 28, Issue: 4, Pages: 267-273, Published: 04 APR 2022
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.28 n.4 2022
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)
instacron:SBMEE
Popis: Introduction: There are no studies comparing the effects of different concurrent training routines [i.e., a resistance training plus high-intensity interval training (RT+HIIT) program compared to an RT plus moderate-intensity continuous training (RT+MICT) program] on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical performance in older adults with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of two concurrent training routines, RT+HIIT versus RT+MICT, on CRF and physical fitness in adults and older adults with MetS. Methods: Thirty-nine participants (67.0±6.7 years of age) were randomly assigned into three groups: RT+ MICT, RT+ HIIT and the control group (CON, no exercise). The 12-week physical training program consisted of 3 sessions/week (~50 minutes/session). The aerobic training component was customized for iso-caloric energy expenditure (P≥0.217) and iso-load distribution (TRIMP, P≥0.893), however the MICT component had a longer aerobic training time (P≤0.01). We evaluated pre- and post-evaluation CRF (VO2peak), physical capacity [power of lower limbs (PLL), running velocity, and running time to exhaustion], plasma lactate, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), resting heart rate (HRrest), and peak heart rate (HRpeak). Results: At the end of the intervention, a significant increase in the VO2peak was observed only in the RT+HIIT group (P=0.01), but compared to the CON group both RT+HIIT and RT+MICT groups had significant improvement in the VO2peak (P≤0.02). Only the RT+HIIT group had lower HRrest as compared to the baseline and the CON group. Also, both RT+HIIT and RT+MICT groups, but not CON, significantly improved running speed, time to exhaustion, and PLL (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE