Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
| Autor: | Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen, Kelsey R. Nylander, Dagoberto Heredia, Elliot J. Bruhl, Jeremy J. Solberg, Kurt B. Angstman |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Treatment outcome personality disorder Collaborative Care Primary care lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Health outcomes Personality Disorders behavioral health Young Adult primary care 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine mental disorders medicine Humans health outcomes In patient 030212 general & internal medicine Cooperative Behavior Psychiatry Depression (differential diagnoses) Aged Retrospective Studies Original Research Aged 80 and over Patient Care Team Community and Home Care Depressive Disorder Major Primary Health Care business.industry lcsh:Public aspects of medicine Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health lcsh:RA1-1270 Middle Aged medicine.disease Personality disorders depression lcsh:R858-859.7 Major depressive disorder Female business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Primary Care & Community Health Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Vol 9 (2018) |
| ISSN: | 2150-1327 |
| Popis: | Background: The use of a collaborative care management (CCM) model can dramatically improve short- and long-term treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with comorbid personality disorder (PD) may experience poorer treatment outcomes for MDD. Our study seeks to examine the differences in MDD treatment outcomes for patients with comorbid PD when using a CCM approach rather than usual care (UC). Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the records of 9614 adult patients enrolled in our depression registry with the clinical diagnosis MDD and the diagnosis of PD (Yes/No). Clinical outcomes for depression were measured with Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) scores at 6 months. Results: In our study cohort, 59.4% of patients (7.1% of which had comorbid PD) were treated with CCM, as compared with 40.6% (6.8% with PD) treated with UC. We found that the presence of a PD adversely affected clinical outcomes of remission within both groups, however, at 6 months patients with PD had significantly lower MDD remission rates when treated with UC as compared with those treated with CCM (11.5% vs 25.2%, P = .002). Patients with PD in the UC group were also noted to have an increased rate of persistent depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥10) at 6 months as compared with those in the CCM group (67.7% vs 51.7%, P = .004). Conclusions: In patients with comorbid MDD and PD, clinical outcomes at 6 months were significantly improved when treated with CCM compared with UC. This finding is encouraging and supports the idea that CCM is an effective model for caring for patients with behavioral concerns, and it may be of even greater benefit for those patients being treated for comorbid behavioral health conditions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|