Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Administered in a Single Infusion Bag, Followed by Vinorelbine: VELVET Cohort 2 Final Results
Autor: | Edith A. Perez, J. M. López-Vega, Martin Andersson, Thierry Petit, Valerie Easton, Claudio Zamagni, Eleonora Restuccia, Julia Kamber |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Oncology Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Breast Neoplasms Neutropenia Antibodies Monoclonal Humanized Vinblastine Vinorelbine 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Trastuzumab Internal medicine Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Breast Cancer medicine Humans skin and connective tissue diseases neoplasms Chemotherapy Pertuzumab business.industry Metastatic breast cancer medicine.disease HER2-positive Surgery Treatment Outcome 030104 developmental biology Docetaxel 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Cohort Female business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | The Oncologist |
ISSN: | 1549-490X 1083-7159 |
DOI: | 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0079 |
Popis: | The final efficacy and safety results are reported for the VELVET Cohort 2 trial, which investigated the coinfusion of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in a single infusion bag, followed by vinorelbine. Background. VELVET Cohort 1 demonstrated the applicability of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and vinorelbine as an alternative first‐line treatment regimen for patients with HER2‐positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who cannot receive docetaxel. Co‐infusion of pertuzumab and trastuzumab may reduce clinic time and medical resource utilization. We report results from Cohort 2, in which pertuzumab and trastuzumab were co‐infused, followed by vinorelbine. Patients and Methods. During cycle 1, patients with HER2‐positive locally advanced or MBC received loading doses of pertuzumab (840 mg) and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg) on consecutive days, followed by vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on days two and nine. From cycle 2 onwards, patients received a co‐infusion of pertuzumab (420 mg) and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) on day one, followed by vinorelbine (30–35 mg/m2) on days one and eight (or days two and nine). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in patients with measurable disease. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS) and safety. Results. Cohort 2 enrolled 107 patients. The ORR was 63.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53.0–73.6) in patients with measurable disease (91/107; 85.0%). Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 10.3–15.8). The most common adverse events [AEs] were diarrhea (57.9%), neutropenia (57.0%), and nausea (41.1%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 85 patients (79.4%) and serious AEs in 44 patients (41.1%). Eighteen patients (16.8%) had AEs suggestive of congestive heart failure. Conclusion. These results support the feasibility of pertuzumab and trastuzumab co‐infusion from a safety perspective and support Cohort 1 conclusions that vinorelbine offers an alternative chemotherapy companion for pertuzumab and trastuzumab. The Oncologist 2017;22:1160–1168 Implications for Practice. Combined treatment with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel is the standard of care for first‐line HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. However, some patients cannot, or choose not to, receive docetaxel. VELVET Cohort 2 results support the results from Cohort 1 that suggest that pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine is a suitable alternative for these patients. In addition to this, results from Cohort 2 support the feasibility of administering pertuzumab and trastuzumab together in a single infusion bag, which has the potential to offer greater patient convenience and reduce active health care professional time and medical resource utilization compared with administering them separately. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |