A Simple Questionnaire as a First-Step Tool to Detect Specific Frailty Profiles: The Lorraine Frailty-Profiling Screening Scale
Autor: | O. Aromatario, Athanase Benetos, Carlos Labat, Jonathan A. Epstein, Anne Freminet, B. Fantino, Christine Perret-Guillaume, M. Mejri, O. Lantieri, Guy Vançon, Marina Kotsani |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Caisse régionale de la Sécurité sociale dans les mines de l’Est (CANSSM Metz), Défaillance Cardiovasculaire Aiguë et Chronique (DCAC), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL), OHS ASSO, Centre d'investigation clinique plurithématique Pierre Drouin [Nancy] (CIC-P), Centre d'investigation clinique [Nancy] (CIC), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL), French national PHRC 2010-A01399-30 program - regional CPER-ITM2P 2015-2020 project, IMPACT GEENAGE, ANR-15-IDEX-0004,LUE,Isite LUE(2015), ANR-15-RHUS-0004,FIGHT-HF,Combattre l'insuffisance cardiaque(2015), European Project: 690140,H2020,H2020-PHC-2015-single-stage,FrailSafe(2016), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), ANR-15-IDEX-0004,LUE (ISITE),Lorraine Université d'Excellence(2016) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Rural Population 030309 nutrition & dietetics Frail Elderly [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] Population Psychological intervention Medicine (miscellaneous) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Multiple correspondence analysis Surveys and Questionnaires medicine Outpatient clinic Profiling (information science) Humans Mass Screening 030212 general & internal medicine Social isolation education Geriatric Assessment Aged Aged 80 and over profile 0303 health sciences education.field_of_study Nutrition and Dietetics Frailty business.industry screening [SDV.MHEP.GEG]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Geriatry and gerontology tool 16. Peace & justice Hierarchical clustering Cross-Sectional Studies Observational study Female Geriatrics and Gerontology medicine.symptom business [SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology Demography |
Zdroj: | Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2020, 24 (7), pp.730-738. ⟨10.1007/s12603-020-1420-6⟩ Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2020, 24 (7), pp.730-738. ⟨10.1007/s12603-020-1420-6⟩ |
ISSN: | 1279-7707 1760-4788 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12603-020-1420-6⟩ |
Popis: | International audience; Objectives: To propose a simple frailty screening tool able to identify frailty profiles.Design: Cross-sectional observational study.Setting: Participants were recruited in 3 different clinical settings: a primary care outpatient clinic (RURAL population, N=591), a geriatric day clinic (DAY-CLINIC population, N=76) and healthy volunteers (URBAN population, N=147).Participants: A total of 817 older adults (>70 years old) living at home were included.Intervention: A 9-item questionnaire (Lorraine Frailty Profiling Screening Scale, LoFProSS), constructed by an experts' working group, was administered to participants by health professionals.Measurements: A Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) followed by a hierarchical clustering of the results of the MCA performed in each population was conducted to identify participant profiles based on their answers to LoFProSS. A response pattern algorithm was resultantly identified in the RURAL (main) population and subsequently applied to the URBAN and DAY-CLINIC populations and, in these populations, the two classification methods were compared. Finally, clinically-relevant profiles were generated and compared for their ability to similarly classify subjects.Results: The response pattern differed between the 3 sub-populations for all 9 items, revealing significant intergroup differences (1.2±1.4 positive responses for URBAN vs. 2.1±1.3 for RURAL vs. 3.1±2.1 for DAY-CLINIC, all p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |