| Autor: |
Zedan, Ayham, Jürgens, Tim, Williges, Ben, Kollmeier, Birger, Wiebe, Konstantin, Galindo, Julio, Wesarg, Thomas |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Zedan, Ayham [0000-0002-0866-1247], Williges, Ben [0000-0002-7476-1334], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Trends in Hearing |
| Popis: |
This study investigated the speech intelligibility benefit of using two different spatial noise reduction algorithms in cochlear implant (CI) users who use a hearing aid (HA) on the contralateral side (bimodal CI users). The study controlled for head movements by using head-related impulse responses to simulate a realistic cafeteria scenario and controlled for HA and CI manufacturer differences by using the master hearing aid platform (MHA) to apply both hearing loss compensation and the noise reduction algorithms (beamformers). Ten bimodal CI users with moderate to severe hearing loss contralateral to their CI participated in the study, and data from nine listeners were included in the data analysis. The beamformers evaluated were the adaptive differential microphones (ADM) implemented independently on each side of the listener and the (binaurally implemented) minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR). For frontal speech and stationary noise from either left or right, an improvement (reduction) of the speech reception threshold of 5.4 dB and 5.5 dB was observed using the ADM, and 6.4 dB and 7.0 dB using the MVDR, respectively. As expected, no improvement was observed for either algorithm for colocated speech and noise. In a 20-talker babble noise scenario, the benefit observed was 3.5 dB for ADM and 7.5 dB for MVDR. The binaural MVDR algorithm outperformed the bilaterally applied monaural ADM. These results encourage the use of beamformer algorithms such as the ADM and MVDR by bimodal CI users in everyday life scenarios. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
