Personalised versus non-individualised case-based CME: A randomised pilot study

Autor: Stoevelaar, Herman, Bahl, Amit, Helsen, Nicky, Michels, Nele, Smets, Louis, Speakman, Mark J., Stranne, Johan, Toelen, Jaan, Van der Aa, Frank, Van Ruysevelt, Luc, Yperman, Jessa, Zilli, Thomas, Tombal, Bertrand F., Michel, Martin C.
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of European CME
ISSN: 2161-4083
DOI: 10.1080/21614083.2022.2153438
Popis: The PinPoint Case Platform (PPCP) offers independent online case-based CME. To align with personal learning needs, a functionality of needs assessments ("QuickScan") was developed, directing users to follow personalised case journeys. A randomised study was conducted, comparing its effectiveness, time efficiency and user experience with a format of non-individualised case-based learning. Forty-two residents in urology from five European countries were randomly assigned to follow non-individualised case-based learning (control group) or a needs assessment plus personalised case journeys on different topics in prostate cancer. After performing a pre- and post-assessment, both groups showed a similar increase in test scores (Mann-Whitney U = 247; p = .113), but the time needed for completing the learning exercise was significantly lower in the group with the personalised approach (median: 45 vs 90 minutes; Mann-Whitney U = 97.5; p = .0141). The quality of the two learning methods was similarly well received by both groups. In conclusion, learners who followed personalised case journeys learned similarly effective but more time efficient than non-individualised case-based learners. Future studies should determine if these findings can be extrapolated to board-certified physicians following CME activities. ispartof: J Eur CME vol:11 issue:1 pages:2153438- ispartof: location:United States status: Published online
Databáze: OpenAIRE