Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs
Autor: | Simone Koenig, Sven P. Heinrich, Felix Tonagel, Michael Bach, Ulrich Schiefer |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Visual acuity genetic structures Visual Acuity Amblyopia law.invention Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience Young Adult Randomized controlled trial Retinal Diseases law Statistics Healthy volunteers Optic Nerve Diseases medicine Humans Aged Aged 80 and over business.industry Two-alternative forced choice Vision Tests Reproducibility of Results Middle Aged medicine.disease eye diseases Sensory Systems Healthy Volunteers Ophthalmology Maculopathy Optometry Female medicine.symptom Visual acuity testing business Landolt C |
Zdroj: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 252(7) |
ISSN: | 1435-702X |
Popis: | Given the diversity of visual acuity tests being employed across the world, we compared two frequently applied tests: ETDRS charts and an eight-orientation projected Landolt C test in accordance with ISO 8596 and DIN 58220 part 3. The goals of the investigation were to determine (i) test agreement and (ii) test–retest reliability, to assess (iii) test durations, and (iv) the acceptance of the tests by the examinees as well as the subjects’ coping with the tests as rated by the examiner. Seventy-five adult subjects with a visual acuity of ≥0.2 (4/20) were included in one of the following groups: normal, media opacity, maculopathy, optic neuropathy, (post)chiasmal lesion, or amblyopia. Visual acuity testing was carried out monocularly, in balanced randomized order and in two runs for each test on the same eye, applying forced choice. Agreement: Within each group, all tests were performed similarly, within ±0.048 logMAR. Reliability: Across all subject groups, with a probability of 95 %, test–retest differences were |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |