Inhibition of afferent transmission in the feeding circuitry of aplysia: persistence can be as important as size
| Autor: | Elizabeth C. Cropper, Colin G. Evans, Adarli Romero |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Physiology Nerve net Neural Inhibition Action Potentials Neurotransmission Motor Activity Inhibitory postsynaptic potential Synaptic Transmission Functional Laterality Postsynaptic potential Aplysia medicine Animals Patch clamp Neurons Afferent Afferent Pathways biology Chemistry General Neuroscience Time constant Dose-Response Relationship Radiation Feeding Behavior Analgesics Non-Narcotic biology.organism_classification Electric Stimulation body regions medicine.anatomical_structure Calcium Carbachol Neural Networks Computer Nerve Net Neuroscience |
| Zdroj: | Journal of neurophysiology. 93(5) |
| ISSN: | 0022-3077 |
| Popis: | We are studying afferent transmission from a mechanoafferent, B21, to a follower, B8. During motor programs, afferent transmission is regulated so that it does not always occur. Afferent transmission is eliminated when spike propagation in B21 fails, i.e., when spike initiation is inhibited in one output region-B21's lateral process. Spike initiation in the lateral process is inhibited by the B52 and B4/5 cells. Individual B52 and B4/5-induced inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in B21 differ. For example, the peak amplitude of a B4/5-induced IPSP is four times the amplitude of a B52 IPSP. Nevertheless, when interneurons fire in bursts at physiological (i.e., low) frequencies, afferent transmission is most effectively reduced by B52. Although individual B52-induced IPSPs are small, they have a long time constant and summate at low firing frequencies. Once IPSPs summate, they effectively block afferent transmission. In contrast, individual B4/5-induced IPSPs have a relatively short time constant and do not summate at low frequencies. B52 and B4/5 therefore differ in that once synaptic input from B52 becomes effective, afferent transmission is continuously inhibited. In contrast, periods of B4/5-induced inhibition are interspersed with relatively long intervals in which inhibition does not occur. Consequently, the probability that afferent transmission will be inhibited is low. In conclusion, it is widely recognized that afferent transmission can be regulated by synaptic input. Our experiments are, however, unusual in that they relate specific characteristics of postsynaptic potentials to functional inhibition. In particular we demonstrate the potential importance of the IPSP time constant. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|