Interaction between three subpopulations of Ehrlich carcinoma in mixed solid tumours in nude mice: evidence of contact domination
| Autor: | Kristian Aabo, Mogens Spang-Thomsen, Lars Vindeløv |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1994 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Cancer Research Pathology medicine.medical_specialty Cell division Drug Resistance Mice Nude Cell Communication Biology Vinblastine Flow cytometry Mice chemistry.chemical_compound Cell–cell interaction Tumor Cells Cultured medicine Animals Ascitic Fluid Carcinoma Ehrlich Tumor Cell Death medicine.diagnostic_test Contact Inhibition Cell growth Contact inhibition DNA Neoplasm Cell cycle Flow Cytometry Phenotype Oncology chemistry Cell culture Cancer research Growth inhibition Cell Division Research Article |
| Zdroj: | British Journal of Cancer |
| ISSN: | 1532-1827 0007-0920 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.1994.255 |
| Popis: | Clonal interaction between three subpopulations of Ehrlich carcinoma were studied during growth as mixed solid tumours and as ascites tumours in immune-incompetent nude NMRI mice. The tumour cell lines differed in DNA content as determined by DNA flow cytometry (FCM). Tumour growth was evaluated by tumour growth curves including calculation of tumour volume doubling times, tumour weight on day 14, cell cycle times (per cent labelled mitoses) and cell cycle distributions (FCM). Two subpopulations (E1.15 and E1.95) showed nearly identical growth characteristics during both solid and ascites tumour growth. The third subpopulation (E1.80) grew more slowly. FCM on fine-needle tumour aspirates was used to determine the relative proportions of the cell populations in mixed solid tumours in which E1.95 showed a growth-dominating effect on E1.15. No such effect was demonstrated during single-cell tumour growth in ascitic fluid in which the cells had no intimate contact. Ascitic fluid from E1.95-bearing animals or radiation-killed E1.95 cells had no effect on the growth of E1.15, and no remote effect was seen when the two cell lines were growing in opposite flanks. This indicates that only viable E1.95 cells in close in vivo contact were able to induce growth inhibition of the E1.15 subpopulation. Both the E1.95 and the E1.15 cells dominated the E1.80 cells, but in these cases cell kinetic differences may have played a role as the E1.95 and the E1.15 lines grew faster than the E1.80. The E1.80 cell line had no dominating effect on the E1.15 or E1.95. It is concluded that non-immunologically mediated cellular dominance in heterogeneous tumours may contribute to the evolution of these tumours and may be involved in fundamental tumour biological phenomena. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|