A national survey of attitudes to research in Scottish General Surgery Trainees

Autor: Devender Mittapalli, S. O’Neill, James Milburn, Nigel B. Jamieson, G Ramsay, Rahul Velineni, CH Richards, A. G. N. Robertson, David G. Watt, Campbell S.D. Roxburgh, A. J. Robson
Rok vydání: 2014
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scottish Medical Journal. 59:9-15
ISSN: 2045-6441
0036-9330
DOI: 10.1177/0036933013518142
Popis: Introduction Given the importance placed on awareness and participation in research by Speciality and Training organisations, we sought to survey Scottish trainee attitudes to exposure to research practice during training and research in or out of programme. Methods An online survey was distributed to core and specialist trainees in general surgery in Scotland. Results Over a 4-month period, 108 trainees (75 ST/SPRs and 33 CTs) completed the survey. In their current post, most were aware of ongoing research projects (77%) and 55% were aware of trial recruitment. Only 47% attend regular journal clubs. Most believe that they are expected to present (89%) and publish (82%) during training. Most (59%) thought that participation in research is well supported. 57% were advised to undertake time out of programme research, mostly by consultants (48%) and training committee (36%). Of the 57 with time out of programme research experience, most did so in early training (37%) or between ST3-5 (47%). 28 out of the 36 (78%) without a national training number secured one after starting research. Most undertook research in a local academic unit (80%) funded by small grants (47%) or internally (33%). Most research (69%) was clinically orientated (13/55 clinical, 25/55 translational). 56% of those completing time out of programme research obtained an MD or PhD. About 91% thought that research was relevant to a surgical career. Conclusions Most trainees believe that research is an important part of training. Generally, most trainees are exposed to research practices including trial recruitment. However
Databáze: OpenAIRE