Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
Autor: | Marcus Hentrich, Vindi Jurinovic, Jessica Debole, Arthur Gerl |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Oncology Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent medicine.medical_treatment Original Article – Clinical Oncology Non-seminoma Germ cell cancer Germ cell tumors Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Testicular Neoplasms Internal medicine medicine Humans Neoplasm Metastasis Aged Retrospective Studies Cisplatin Chemotherapy Hematology business.industry Significant difference General Medicine Seminoma Middle Aged Neoplasms Germ Cell and Embryonal medicine.disease Large cohort 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis IGCCCG classification business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology |
ISSN: | 1432-1335 0171-5216 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-020-03343-2 |
Popis: | Purpose Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy. Methods Patients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification. Results Of 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group. Conclusion Compared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |