Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization
| Autor: | Jon I. Einarsson, Emilie V. J. van Limburg Stirum, Alexis Lindsey, Sarah L. Cohen, Nisse V. Clark, Andreas L. Thurkow, Xiangmei Gu |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
050101 languages & linguistics medicine.medical_specialty Sterilization Tubal Hysteroscopy Essure 050105 experimental psychology Cohort Studies Postoperative Complications Patient satisfaction Surveys and Questionnaires medicine Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Vaginal bleeding business.industry Obstetrics Pelvic pain 05 social sciences Retrospective cohort study Odds ratio Middle Aged Sterilization (medicine) Adverse events Hysteroscopic sterilization Female Surgery medicine.symptom business Removal Research Article Abdominal surgery |
| Zdroj: | JSLS, 24(1):e2019.00065. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons |
| ISSN: | 1086-8089 |
| Popis: | Study Objective: The objective of the study was to identify factors associated with negative patient experiences with Essure. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study and follow-up survey. Setting: The study was conducted in an academic setting. Patients: Patients included women who had an Essure placed between 2002 and 2017. Methods: The hospitals' database was queried to identify subjects and charts were reviewed to confirm medical information. Subjects were invited by mail, e-mail, or phone call to participate a survey regarding symptoms and satisfaction with Essure. A comparison was made between women who reported a negative experience with Essure versus those who did not. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify subject or procedural characteristics associated with any negative experience with Essure sterilization. Results: Two hundred eighty-four women underwent Essure sterilization between 2002 and 2017, 42.3% of whom responded to the follow-up survey. Satisfaction with Essure was reported by 61.9% of respondents. Thirty-three percent of the respondents have undergone removal or desire removal of the device. The most frequent symptoms attributed to Essure were pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and vaginal bleeding. Forty-eight percent of the respondents were identified as having any negative experience with Essure. Factors associated with negative experiences with Essure included young age at placement (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–0.94; P < .001), high gravidity (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.71; P = .002), and absent history of abdominal surgery (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12–1.00; P = .049). Conclusion: Young age at placement, high gravidity, and absent history of abdominal surgery are factors associated with negative patient experiences following Essure sterilization. A negative experience with Essure is common, although dissatisfaction with the device is not always attributable to symptoms. This information could be considered when counseling women who plan removal of Essure. Implications Statement: Our study provides new follow-up data with respect to hysteroscopic sterilization. This research is the first to examine any cause for negative patient experiences with Essure. Understanding factors associated with negative patient experiences could improve patient counseling regarding the extent to which symptoms could be attributed to Essure as well as counseling women who want to undergo removal of the device. These factors could in turn prove to be predictors for successful resolution of symptoms after removal of Essure. Results of this study could also be used for developing future hysteroscopic sterilization techniques. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|