Atrial mapping during pulmonary vein pacing to detect conduction gaps in a second pulmonary vein isolation procedure
Autor: | Sergio Madero, Jesús Almendral, Eduardo Castellanos, Carla Lázaro, María Teresa Barrio-López, Mercedes Ortiz, Jefferson Salas, Martín Arceluz |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Isolation procedures Kaplan-Meier Estimate 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Risk Assessment Pulmonary vein Electrocardiography 03 medical and health sciences Imaging Three-Dimensional 0302 clinical medicine Recurrence Physiology (medical) Internal medicine Atrial Fibrillation medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Aged Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies business.industry Body Surface Potential Mapping Cardiac Pacing Artificial Atrial fibrillation Middle Aged Ablation medicine.disease Treatment Outcome Pulmonary Veins Catheter Ablation Cardiology Procedure Duration Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 53:195-205 |
ISSN: | 1572-8595 1383-875X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10840-018-0371-x |
Popis: | Finding the conduction gaps in redo PV isolation procedures is challenging, and several maneuvers have been described. In the present study, we analyze the pace and map (PM) maneuver [atrial mapping during pulmonary vein (PV) pacing] to locate the gaps in redo PV isolation procedures.Consecutive patients undergoing a second PV isolation procedure at a single institution over a 4-year period were included. For the last 2 years, all the patients (n = 38) studied underwent PV isolation based on the PM maneuver and were compared to the previous patients (n = 45). The atrial side of the ablation line was mapped with the ablation catheter during PV pacing, and the earliest site was considered a gap site.Shorter radiofrequency time was required to obtain PV isolation in the PM group (485 ± 374 vs. 864 ± 544 s; p 0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for the number of reconnected PVs (p = 0.01). We did not find significant differences in the procedure duration (106 ± 46 vs. 112 ± 53 min; p = 0.57) and arrhythmia recurrence during 1-year follow-up (26.6 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.82) after adjusting for several confounding factors (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.5-3.4; p = 0.57).PM is a simple maneuver to identify the gaps in ablation lines around the PV. It remains efficacious in redo procedures despite the difficulties in localizing the ablation lines performed in the first procedure. The PM maneuver reduced the radiofrequency time required to isolate the PV without compromising the efficacy. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |