Reflection: A Socratic approach
| Autor: | Inge C. M. van Seggelen-Damen, Iwan Wopereis, Rene van Hezewijk, Anne Helsdingen |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | RS-Research Line Fostering Effective, Efficient and Enjoyable Learning (FEEEL) (part of WO program), Department Work and Organizational Psychology, RS-Research Line Work and organisational psychology (part of IIESB program), Academic Field Psychology, RS-Research Program The Interaction between Implicit and Explicit Strategies for Behaviour (IIESB), Center of Expertise for Education and Professionalisation, RS-Research Line General psychology (part of IIESB program) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Socratic dialogue
Reflective practice PRIVATE SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS 050109 social psychology INSIGHT PSYCHOLOGY History and Philosophy of Science REFLEXIVITY Reflexivity Coupled system reflective practice Socratic method Fuzzy concept 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences BRAIN Reflection (computer graphics) General Psychology 05 social sciences 050301 education Articles Epistemology MODEL Linschoten EXPERIENCE 0503 education reflection |
| Zdroj: | Theory & Psychology Van Seggelen-Damen, I, Van Hezewijk, R, Helsdingen, A & Wopereis, I 2017, ' Reflection: A Socratic approach ', Theory & Psychology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 793-814 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317736388 Theory & Psychology, 27(6), 793-814. SAGE Publications Ltd |
| ISSN: | 1461-7447 |
| Popis: | Reflection is a fuzzy concept. In this article we reveal the paradoxes involved in studying the nature of reflection. Whereas some scholars emphasize its discursive nature, we go further and underline its resemblance to the self-biased dialogue Socrates had with the slave in Plato’s Meno. The individual and internal nature of the reflection process creates difficulty for studying it validly and reliably. We focus on methodological issues and use Hans Linschoten’s view of coupled systems to identify, analyze, and interpret empirical research on reflection. We argue that researchers and research participants can take on roles in several possible system couplings. Depending on who controls the manipulation of the stimulus, who controls the measuring instrument, who interprets the measurement and the response, different types of research questions can be answered. We conclude that reflection may be validly studied by combining different couplings of experimenter, manipulation, stimulus, participant, measurement, and response. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|