Furlong Hydroxyapatite-Coated Hip Prosthesis vs the Charnley Cemented Hip Prosthesis
| Autor: | Prakash Chandran, Mohamed Azzabi, Mark Andrews, John G. Bradley, Jeremy N. V. Miles |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty Arthroplasty Replacement Hip medicine.medical_treatment Dentistry Prosthesis Postoperative Complications Coated Materials Biocompatible medicine Overall survival Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Cementation Aged business.industry Significant difference Middle Aged Survival Analysis Prosthesis Failure Surgery Durapatite Prospective trial Harris Hip Score Female Hip Prosthesis business Follow-Up Studies Total hip arthroplasty |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Arthroplasty. 25:52-57 |
| ISSN: | 0883-5403 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.009 |
| Popis: | We report the results of a prospective trial comparing uncemented Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty and cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty. One hundred ninety-one patients were allocated into 2 groups depending on their year of birth. One group received a Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty and the other group received a cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty. At a mean follow-up of 14 years (12-16 years), Harris hip scores showed no difference between the 2 groups. The longitudinal multilevel model analysis shows that the mean slope of the change in the Harris hip score was −0.02 for the Furlong group and −0.05 for the Charnley group; the difference is 0.03 ( P = .002). The survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier regression analysis (the log-rank test λ 2 1 = 0.031, P = .58) does not show a significant difference between the 2 groups. Overall survival was 93.6% in the Furlong group and 94.8% in the Charnley group. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect