Detection and Dynamic Changes of EGFR Mutations from Circulating Tumor DNA as a Predictor of Survival Outcomes in NSCLC Patients Treated with First-line Intercalated Erlotinib and Chemotherapy
Autor: | Jennifer Sandoval-Tan, Barbara Klughammer, Sumitra Thongprasert, Matt Truman, Guia Ladrera, Wei Wen, Tony Mok, Julie Tsai, Jin Soo Lee, Virote Sriuranpong, Yi-Long Wu, David S. Shames, Lin Wu, Yunzhong Zhu, Benjamin Margono, Vichien Srimuninnimit, Chong-Jen Yu, Caicun Zhou, Meilin Liao, Fatima Fuerte |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
Oncology
Male Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Pathology Lung Neoplasms Concordance medicine.medical_treatment DNA Mutational Analysis Platinum Compounds Kaplan-Meier Estimate Placebo Deoxycytidine Disease-Free Survival Erlotinib Hydrochloride Double-Blind Method Internal medicine Carcinoma Non-Small-Cell Lung Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols medicine Carcinoma Blood test Humans Aged Chemotherapy medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Cancer DNA Neoplasm Genes erbB-1 Middle Aged medicine.disease Gemcitabine Intercalating Agents Treatment Outcome Mutation Female Erlotinib business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 21(14) |
ISSN: | 1557-3265 |
Popis: | Purpose: Blood-based circulating-free (cf) tumor DNA may be an alternative to tissue-based EGFR mutation testing in NSCLC. This exploratory analysis compares matched tumor and blood samples from the FASTACT-2 study. Experimental Design: Patients were randomized to receive six cycles of gemcitabine/platinum plus sequential erlotinib or placebo. EGFR mutation testing was performed using the cobas tissue test and the cobas blood test (in development). Blood samples at baseline, cycle 3, and progression were assessed for blood test detection rate, sensitivity, and specificity; concordance with matched tumor analysis (n = 238), and correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Concordance between tissue and blood tests was 88%, with blood test sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 96%. Median PFS was 13.1 versus 6.0 months for erlotinib and placebo, respectively, for those with baseline EGFR mut+ cfDNA [HR, 0.22; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.14–0.33, P < 0.0001] and 6.2 versus 6.1 months, respectively, for the EGFR mut− cfDNA subgroup (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65–1.04, P = 0.1076). For patients with EGFR mut+ cfDNA at baseline, median PFS was 7.2 versus 12.0 months for cycle 3 EGFR mut+ cfDNA versus cycle 3 EGFR mut− patients, respectively (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21–0.48, P < 0.0001); median OS by cycle 3 status was 18.2 and 31.9 months, respectively (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.84, P = 0.0066). Conclusions: Blood-based EGFR mutation analysis is relatively sensitive and highly specific. Dynamic changes in cfDNA EGFR mutation status relative to baseline may predict clinical outcomes. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3196–203. ©2015 AACR. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |